Saturday, 23 February 2013

Geoffrey DIckens MP in Fear for his life following his exposure of Paedophile Ring and Child Porn Network

  Finally the truth is being printed about  the VIP Paedophile  and child porn network cover-up by  Parliament, the Police and the Courts. 

A burly veteran of scores of amateur boxing bouts, the Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens was best known during his bustling 16-year career in Parliament as a pugnacious right-winger who supplied “hang ‘em and flog ‘em” quotes to the tabloids.

Eighteen years after his death, however, the backbencher’s reputation as a political lightweight is being revised in the wake of a Scotland Yard investigation which is exhuming a scandal long buried in the Westminster of Margaret Thatcher’s premiership.

New evidence suggests that Dickens stumbled upon an Establishment paedophile ring in the early 1980s – and that his efforts to expose a cover-up left him in fear of his life. Dickens told fellow MPs that after warning of the existence of the network, he had received threatening phone calls and been burgled twice. He also claimed he had been placed on a “hit-list”, he told the House of Commons in a little-noticed speech.

For four years between 1981 and 1985, Dickens railed in Parliament against a paedophile ring which he claimed was connected to a trade in child pornography, then controlled by gangsters.

In 1981 Dickens had used Parliamentary privilege to name a diplomat and MI6 operative, Sir Peter Hayman as a pederast and demanded the Attorney General explain why he had escaped prosecution over the discovery of violent pornography on a London bus two years previously.

Two years later, in 1983, he warned a paedophile network involved “big, big names – people in positions of power, influence and responsibility” and threatened to expose them in Parliament.
In 1984, he campaigned for the outlawing of Sir Peter’s Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) organisation. He also handed a dossier containing allegations of abuse of children in local authority care to the then Home Secretary, Leon Brittan.

After a 30-minute meeting with Sir Leon, Dickens said he had been “encouraged” but later expressed concern that the Cabinet Minister had not banned the PIE.

Last month Metropolitan Police began Operation Fernbridge into allegations that residents of a childrens home in Richmond, west London, were taken to the nearby Elm Guest House in Barnes, where they were abused.  Pornography involving adults having sex with children was allegedly shot at the property and then circulated commercially.

Sir Peter was among the visitors to the property. Others, according to a list seized by Scotland Yard last month, were the late Liberal MP Cyril Smith, the former Russian spy Sir Anthony Blunt, a Sinn Fein politician, a Labour MP, and several Conservative politicians.

After neighbours complained about the arrival of children, the police raided the guesthouse in 1982 but the operation was mysteriously cut short. A 2003 investigation also failed.

During a debate on child abuse in the House of Commons on 29 November 1985, Dickens warned that paedophiles were “evil and dangerous,” adding child pornography generated “vast sums.”
He went on: “The noose around my neck grew tighter after I named a former high-flying British diplomat on the Floor of the House.

Honourable Members will understand that where big money is involved and as important names came into my possession so the threats began. 

“First, I received threatening telephone calls followed by two burglaries at my London home. Then, more seriously, my name appeared on a multi-killer’s hit list.”

In a blog on his website, the Labour MP Tom Watson – whose claims of  a powerful paedophile network prompted the new inquiry – said that he had been advised by childcare  experts who have tried to expose the scandal to be careful about his personal security. He has asked the Home Office for the dossier presented by Dickens to Sir Leon, but it has not yet been found.

Dickens does not appear to have raised the issue in the Commons again prior to his death in 1995. He told friends he was surprised he had never been made a minister.   source

Jeremy Thorpe accused of murdering his gay lover Norman Scott with Ted heath accused of murdering children from children's homes


Geoffrey Dickens is believed to have made two official copies of his 50-page dossier highlighting paedophiles in Britain’s establishment.
They contained claims of police corruption, names of senior ­politicians and are believed to have referred to the ­notorious Elm Guest House.
The B&B in south-west London is the subject of a police probe into ­allegations that VIPs went there to abuse boys from a nearby care home.
 Mr Dickens gave one dossier to the Home Office in 1984 but it apparently vanished. Oh yes

The other was kept by the colourful MP for Littleborough and Saddleworth until his death at the age of 63. That copy was ­ordered to be destroyed by Mr Dickens’ widow Norma who thought it was “too sensitive” to keep in the family home. She died last year.

Their son Barry, 49, told the Sunday People: “My ­father’s file was ­destroyed after his death in 1995 because my mother considered it too sensitive to have hanging around the house. It had been many years since Dad had handed the other copy to the Home Secretary and ­unfortunately ­nothing had come of it.”
It means the only possible ­remaining full orgional copy of the dossier is with the Home Office.

MP Tom Watson has asked the Home Office to produce the ­dossier. Officials are still trying to track it down.
In 1981 Mr Dickens, then MP for Huddersfield West, had fired the first salvo against top paedophiles when he named diplomat Sir Peter Hayman. More information flooded in and in 1984 he handed his dossier to Home Secretary Leon Brittan.

The Home Office agreed to investigate the allegations and in the mean time Mr Dickens agreed not to use the ­protection of ­parliamentary ­privilege to name more paedophiles.

In 1985 the brave MP told the Commons he had received ­threatening phone calls and had been put on a “multi-killer’s hit list” following his campaign.
Shockingly it has taken 30 years for Mr Dickens’ allegations to be probed. At the time some MPs tried to undermine his campaign.
His son Barry said: “I see the new investigations as re-establishing my father’s reputation as a ­serious, campaigning politician.
“People like Jimmy Savile might have been rooted out three ­decades ago if the Government had acted on my father’s dossier.”



  1. Lenny Harper was taken off the child abuse investigation into a children's home in Jersey - Haut de la Garenne. His online testimony is well worth a read. And the documentary, Sun, Sea and Satanism is worth a watch. Fritz Springmeier also writes a lot of interesting stuff on the issue of child abuse.

  2. many young boys were abused at pontefract boys home, but no one be interested as they were naughty boys there for breaking the law or absconding school

    1. Duncroft was an Approved School to which children were sentenced by the Courts and it was the Duncroft girls who started the exposure of Jimmy Savile. This has now snowballed.

      If abuse took place in Pontefract Boys Home lets know about it. We are all interested where can be find out more?

  3. My child and I have been persecuted by a massive pedophile ring embedded in Scotland's Local Authorities, for around a decade. But nobody wants to know when it's living breathing person saying this, but when they don't know the victim it's a big huge controversy. They are members of the police, social work, health, education, even other stuff like HMRC and phone companies, they can and do tamper with everything when you are one of their victims. I do not know who to trust, I'm fed up, and I feel responsible that people who tried to help my child and I paid for it with their jobs. I don't know who to trust. And I'm sick of how easily people are forced into becoming enablers because they just don't bloody know what they are caught up in and wont hear that there is something very sinister happening. And somehow they can justify it all despite laws being broken right in front of them. And there's the enablers who know exactly what they are doing and wear pedo symbols showing me they aren't interested in my child themselves because they prefer abusing the other gender of children... I asked a charity "How does one fight a pedophile ring?" I am actually a year later still awaiting a reply. It's crossed my mind to try seeking asylum, only I have no idea if that's really going to help, how does one prove one is being persecuted and in danger when all paperwork has been with held and entire histories have been fictionalised and re-embellished so many times. And what's to stop it happening again. I tried leaving this country and starting a new life for us in a neighbouring European country, and as soon as my child was enrolled in school all hell broke loose there and they pretty much forced us to choose between running away back home or be torn apart in that country... PS the person who was my child's abuser is very high up in her field and job and used to boast about her "darling friends Tony and Cherie".

    1. Please, please get in touch with us at we can help you by putting you in touch with experienced people who know what you are saying is the truth.

      We will do everything we can to help you and your child.

  4. Pray to the God of the Bible He can and will help you. Just ask Him. Put your trust in Him. When His son our blessed Saviour returns He'll put an end to these goings on.

    1. Your god is about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.

  5. so proud, my grandad geoff did what was right and justice will be found in the end.

    1. Your Grandad was a great man and a wonderful politician, history will show how much he did for children even from beyond the veil.

  6. Leon Brittan was a guest at Elm Guest House, in which he dressed as a made, naked child on his lap, so one photo

  7. Its all malicious. Nothing concrete...all tittle tattle and spurious connections. A disgusting site.

  8. The file isn't lost, nor is it at the Home Office or Scotland Yard. It's at SIS HQ. Gareth Williams found it and was about to do a Bradley Manning and go public. That's why he ended up in stuffed into a holdall. The message to everyone working at SIS? Keep your mouth shut or we can kill you and no one will ever be brought to book. Not that anyone there would particularly, they're all carefully vetted (as are all those privy to sensitive information in whatever capacity) not to allow potential whisleblowers into the inner circle. Show those sort of tendancies and you'll never rise above medium rank, no matter what your capacities. How much do you want to bet this all ends at the Royal family's doorstep? Plotline here for the next James Bond movie? James goes after Wikileaks to prevent them from bringing down the British establishment? Or would that be a little too close to the bone?

  9. Beware of red herrings (the often more ridiculous and outlandish claims) put out and about by government agencies with a view to undermining real claims in order to make them seem the work of cranks or people with an agenda. Also be aware that some of those offering help or advice are in fact government agencies themselves. I.e. Tuckers solicitors who claim to be specialists in prosecuting cases of police misconduct (and who handled the Ian Tomlinson case) are not so much working for the police as they are the police. I contacted them after one of my front teeth was smashed in by a police riot shield. Among my complaints relating to police conduct that day was the tactic used by police of jabbing (underneath the riot shield so as to be hidden from the TV cameras) with their batons (in a similar fashion to how Roman soldiers were trained to jab with their swords) at the stomach and groin area. My stomach, groin and upper thighs were black and blue in the days following as a result of repeatedly being struck thus. Injuries that would have provided corobarative evidence, with regards to the tactics and consequences thereof, that would have been extremely useful in prosecuting the Ian Tomlinson case, bearing in mind the nature of his injuries (internal injuries that resulted in his heart failure and death). I was told by Tuckers that they had a full caseload and would not be able to handle my case and suggested I go elsewhere. Stupid of them? More like complicit! The result of the IPCC investigation (handed over to and conducted by the police) is scandalous in itself. I appealed the findings of the investigation and five of the seven points I raised (the major ones) were upheld by the IPCC, but was informed that no further action would be taken and if I wished to pursue I must do so independently. With this I approached Tuckers, whilst the Tomlinson case was still ongoing and my case would have considerably supported. Only to be told to go away as they were too busy. I know this is kind of unrelated to the topic being dealt with here, but I mention in order to illustrate just how corrupt the police and by extension the establishment are. Not so much in the sense of bribery and such (although a fair bit of that goes on as well, I'm sure) but in the sense of covering up wrongdoing. Incidentally I am / was the same age as Ian Tomlinson and if I hadn't been so fit / muscletoned, there but for the grace of god, go I.

    1. Ooopsie, didn't mention date or event in the previous posting. I refer to the G20 protests in April 2009 (1st of April to be exact and I guess I wasn't the only April fool to think that this was a country in which everybody got a fair hearing and ordinary people had recourse to the law, LOL. You have to laugh or else you cry!)


We welcome all points of view but do not publish malicious comments. We would love to hear from you if you want to e-mail us with tips, information or just chat e-mail