Monday, 29 October 2012


The  letter written below is penned  by Simon Regan  Editor of Scallyway Magazine   who's  half  Brother  Angus  James Wilson,  co founder of Scallywag  and editor of its sucessor Spiked  died  in Cyprus  around  1996  whilst the magazine  was investigating  the elite paedophile ring operating in North Wales children's homes and beyond. 

In his letter dated February 2000 Simon documents Scallywag's investigation into the North Wales Child Abuse scandal   and the tragic  cover-up by the Courts and the Establishment.

Whilst the Establishment stole  the affidavits the  abused children had made,  naming their high profile abusers,  notes of interviews were kept by investigator Andrea Davison  only to be seized  by the Derby and North Wales Police in January 2010.

Now that this paedophile ring, which Jimmy Savile procured for, is being exposed its time that the Establishment and  Police returned the Affidavits and the notes of these interviews.  The names given by these abused children, some of whom died tragically, should be investigated anew but who can be trusted to do the investigation?

The daily mail recently  wrote   this article  which opened up the whole North Wales Child abuse scandal up again.  William Hauge   and other Members of the  last Tory  Government  covered up the fact the  Peter Morrison MP  Thatchers close friend  and aid was named by children in the North Wales children's homes as being a  child abuser linked to an elite  paedophile ring.

HOLDING COURT: Scallywag editor and publisher Simon Regan with some of the women he described as a ‘monstrous regiment’ Pictures: Idris Martin

Simon Regan with party friends in  happier times Photo by: Idris Martin


The Waterhouse Report

By Simon Regan

20 February 2000

The fact that the Waterhouse report went as far as it did is highly commendable, and obviously long overdue. But the trouble with any investigation which tries to break through a 'cult of silence' is the lingering doubts that it will ever get down to the whole full truth of the matter. Waterhouse is probably merely the tip of the iceberg.

The report suggests there is 'no evidence' that Freemasonry had anything to do with the scandal. Yet there were two inadequate and inconclusive police inquiries, including one into a senior officer, by a force in North Wales riddled with freemasons.

There was a consistent lack of initiative on the part of the local Clwyd CC in the face of overwhelming evidence of consistent child abuse at Bryn Estyn, ostensibly because the council insurers advised against any action. This in itself insults democracy in a way that borders on the criminal. By a policy of non-action, both the police and the council became embroiled in a blatant cover-up.

Anyone who has even vaguely become acquainted with paedophilia knows very well that they will go to the ends of the earth to keep their activities absolutely secret. They are professional experts in covering their tracks.

In the early nineties, in the now defunct Scallywag magazine, which I founded, we interviewed in some depth twelve former inmates at Bryn Estyn who had all been involved in the Wrexham paedophile ring, which the tribunal acknowledges existed. Most of these interviews were extremely harrowing and disturbing, but were gently and sensitively conducted over pub lunches where the victim could relax. We subsequently persuaded ten of them to make sworn affidavits which we proposed to use as back up to half a dozen paedophile stories we later published.

Two of these young men, who had been 14-years-old at the time, swore they had been not only introduced to the paedophile ring operating in the Crest Hotel in Wrexham but had later been escorted on three or four occasions to an address in Pimlico where they were further abused.

We took them separately to Pimlico and asked them to point out the building where this had taken place. They were both positive in their identification. It turned out to be the private flat of a well known, and since highly discredited lobbyist who later went into obscurity in some disgrace because of his involvement with Mohammed al-Fayed and the 'cash for questions' scandal. At the time we ran a story entitled 'Boys for Questions' and named several prominent members of the then Thatcher government. These allegations went to the very top of the Tory party, yet there was a curious and almost ominous lack of writs.

The lobbyist was a notorious 'queen' who specialised in gay parties with a 'political mix' in the Pimlico area - most convenient to the Commons - and which included selected flats in Dolphin Square. The two young men were able to give us very graphic descriptions of just what went on, including acts of buggery, and alleged that they were only two of many from children's homes other than North Wales.

There was, to my certain knowledge, at least one resignation from the Conservative office in Smith Square once we had published our evidence and named names.

Subsequently, over a rent dispute which is still a matter of litigation, Dr. Julian Lewis, now Conservative MP for New Forest (East) but then deputy head of research at Conservative Central Office in Smith Square, managed to purchase the contents of our offices, which included all our files. It had been alleged that we owed rent, which we disputed, but under a court order the landlords were able to change the locks and seize our assets which included all our files, including those we had made on paedophiles. It was apparently quite legal, but it was most certainly a dirty trick.

All of a sudden very private information, some of it even privileged between ourselves and our lawyer during the John Major libel action, was being published in selected, pro-Conservative sections of the media.

Subsequently, during a court case initiated by Lewis, I was able in my defence to seek discovery of documents and asked to see the seized files. The paedophile papers were missing. This is a very great shame, because Sir Ronald Waterhouse certainly should have been aware of them.

I believe that the secrecy the Establishment wraps around itself easily equals that of the paedophiles. They really do look after each other and quite professionally cover their tracks.

The real trouble about exposing paedophiles is that former victims of child abuse make lousy witnesses. By the very nature of the abuse, when they are rudely shoved out into the wide world (one of the witnesses, Stephen Messham, for example, was released on his sixteenth birthday on Christmas day after two years of abuse, and had to sleep rough on the streets for four and a half months), they are often deeply psychologically disturbed.

Some of the extreme cases commit suicide, many more were sexually disorientated in the worst possible way. Some became gay prostitutes, others drug addicts, and in nearly every case, at some stage, they needed lengthy counselling. Marriages quickly disintegrated in psychological turmoil and a lot of former victims had real difficulties raising their own children. There are very few victims of child abuse who come out of it without deep scars.

It was all very well for us to take statements from former victims in the cosy atmosphere of a pub lunch, but put them up against an agile and eminent QC whose sole task is to discredit them, and they quickly crumble, even break down in tears. Many former victims now have criminal records of some kind, owing almost exclusively to the abuse itself, and the barrister will brutally exploit this as evidence that the witness is unreliable and tainted. Faced with the choice of a clearly neurotic young man who quickly falls down in the witness box, and a smooth, experienced, erudite and often highly respected culprit, juries tend to give the accused the benefit of the doubt.

I watched it in the now famous Court 13 at the High Court during the libel action between former Supt. Gordon Anglesey and Private Eye (and others) when, despite the fact that under cross examination, Anglesey had to admit that his evidence did not correspond with his own notebooks, the 'other side' subsequently tore the five main prosecution witnesses to pieces in a monumental act of judicial harassment. Like the whole story of child abuse in North Wales and elsewhere, it broke my heart.

Simon Regan (deceased) was editor of Scallywag Magazine 

Read more:-  link to one actual Scallywag article  about McAlpine  written by Angus James

The final paragraph in Scallywag's Article  reads "and by the way just for the record the editors of Scallwag absolutely hate satsumas"    

This Satsuma reference  is to   Stephen Milligan who  was a Tory MP and Parliamentary Private Secretary to the notorious Tory cabinet  minister  Jonathan Aitken. Stephen Milligan the PPS  who knew too mutch.   On 7th February 1994, he was reported to have been found tied to a chair with a plastic bag over his head and a satsuma stuffed into his mouth. The usual embarrassment surrounding these cases seem to have prevented the press from carrying out an in-depth investigation into various discrepancies in the case. Aitken, was known to have an particular interest in Sado-Masochistic sex - Milligan wasn't. He was engaged at the time to a woman who is now a Tory MP. More relevant perhaps is Aitken's well-documented links to intelligence agencies and his role in shadowy arms deals that were conducted in the Ritz hotel in Paris in 1993.At this time Aitken was the head of an International Intelligence Service called Le Cercle  and Milligan was taken out in this bizarre way perhaps as a warning to Aitken  or perhaps  to silence him.  Aitken quickly toppled from his high perch shortly after Milligans Death.

What happened to  the Journalists and Researchers who worked  with Scallywag  and its successor Spiked.!

The Co-founders  of Scallywag Simon Regan  and his half brother Angus James Wilson  are both deceased. Angus died in strange circumstances in Cyprus in 1996     and Simon Regan died  in 2000 disappointed he could  not have done more to expose the paedophile ring.    

Simon Stander stayed in Cyprus  following the strange road accident which killed Angus James Wilson. His  was last known to be  teaching in  a University in Costa Rica

Journalist Peter Sawyer went on to write the Book  'GOTCHA'  with  the Knight brothers  and a  former member of the Flying squad.  He  became a producer on a number of documentaries and wrote freelance for both the tabloids and the broadsheets.  read more

Andrea Davison went on to expose arms to Iraq and was an intelligence adviser to the Trade and Industry Select Committee on Arms to Iraq and gave evidence in secret to Lord Justice Scott's Inquiry into Arms to Iraq.  Illness caused by her work in Iraq meant she had to retire  from front line work and so she  carried on working in the background until she was set-up by Cameron's  Conservative Government and wrongly convicted in July 2012.   Andrea is now a refugee  in South America     Read More Andrea Davison, Jimmy Savile, SERCO and How it all...

Friday, 26 October 2012


Jimmy Savile: case for the Defence:   by Felicity Gerry

Corrupt Barrister Felicity Gerry wrote  an article for The Times Newapaper defending Jimmy Savile following revelations of his prolific child abuse. 


One might have expected, as a barrister, she would have addressed  the shocking exposure that the Courts, who keep her in champagne,  sent children to DUNCROFT approved school where they would be powerless to protect themselves from mental, physical and sexual abuse of monsters like Jimmy Savile.  But in her article Gerry writes  "the Courts and the Justice system were not to blame"

Instead of revealing the corrupt Court System  Gerry chose to write an apology for Jimmy Savile. Not a surprise because together with paedophiles in the Police she was instrumental is stealing evidence  of  child abuse   from Andrea Davison who exposed  paedophiles in Childrens Homes and Approved Schools  like  Duncroft.  Gerry went on to set-up Andrea Davison and prosecute her enabling the police   to keep the evidence of child abuse and discredit the whistleblower

There is a well known  group of  Police, Judges, Barristers and Politicians  who all part of the Paedophile ring and they still believe they can fool us all.  Anyone noticed Jimmy Sa -VILE! 


Read what she writes in the TIMES? 

 The text of the article is Below. 

"It is worth reflecting on why such cases were not tried in the past and on how much progress the law has made.
The law in the Seventies was rubbish, especially in relation to female victims. That’s why we are dealing with so many historic cases now. I grew up in the Seventies. It was a wonderful and loving time. I was not the victim of child abuse. That my babysitter’s lovely boyfriend was an adult man was not considered odd. Of itself, this doesn’t mean he raped or abused anyone as it is the sex, not the age difference that is (and was) the crime – but I was once told he had a conviction for underage sex and that her parents knew.


The complaints against Jimmy Savile were not dealt with at the time nor was there a later complaint when he was still alive. This means that there will never be a criminal trial although, judging by the letter to BBC employees, it is clear that there is a police investigation – so who knows who might be implicated.
There have also been calls for an inquiry, which would at least allow the evidence to be forensically tested rather than trial by media. The problem is that it is unlikely that these victims will want to give evidence in such a situation. They were vulnerable when young and felt unable to make formal complaints until he was dead. Just as in the Sandusky case recently dealt with in the US, those with suspicions failed to act. Is there a defence for such monstrous allegations? In all the shock at the quantity and detail of the complaints against Jimmy Savile, it is worth reflecting on why such cases were not tried in the past, how much progress the law has made and how much child protection depends on the actions of others.
Underage Sex
For those girls groped or penetrated, the maximum sentence in the Seventies was two years imprisonment and any prosecution for sexual intercourse was could not be brought after 12 months. There was a defence for anyone under 24 and men were commonly not tried if they asserted that they did not know the girl was under age. Sex with girls was not taken seriously. I am sure Savile spun discs such as Young Girl get out of my mind with no discomfort at all, just as everyone else sang along without thinking of the implications. At that time, there was also a requirement that an allegation be corroborated (still required in Scotland but no longer here).
It seems that Savile admitted such “conquests” in his autobiography, implicating police officers in the process. Such conduct was simply not seen as abuse as it is now and was conducted by celebrities, those in authority and others with impunity. The problem in this case is that no one stopped to consider whether it was consensual or not. The law is a great leveller but there can’t be an investigation unless someone tells the authorities something is going on. These days the law is much tougher, victims are assisted to give evidence, sentences are longer and prosecutions are usually successful, if brought to court. The consequence is that people can feel more encouraged about coming forward whether as victims or witnesses and people like me work hard to make sure cases are fairly tried, not swept under the carpet.
The accounts of the women who allege that they were forced to have sexual intercourse with Savile were compelling. In rape trials they often are. Victims feel violated whatever the law. It is important that they complain so that an investigation can be launched. It is just as important that the investigation is conducted properly and fairly looking at the evidence from both sides. A person complaining of rape should be taken seriously but so should someone who denies they are a rapist. In any subsequent trial the stakes are high on both sides. A successful prosecution will depend on the evidence. In some cases this will depend on how accurate the victim is as a witness. In others there will be evidence to support the complaint. Some cases are emotional, some are horrific and some are hopeless. There is no standard rape and all rapes are serious.
Generally sex takes place between two people. Rape trials involve an analysis of a private sexual event. Many victims believe they have been raped when they did not consent. Many suspects say they believed the victim was consenting. The law on rape is (and was in the Seventies) that it is only rape if there was penetration when the victim was not consenting and the perpetrator did not reasonably believe there was consent.
No one should be labelled a rapist if they genuinely believed this was a mutually consensual experience. The consequence is that even where a victim does not consent, a perpetrator may not be guilty of rape because of what was going on in his head at the time. I have prosecuted and defended cases ranging from violent penetration of a disabled child to a momentary encounter between adults in a dark alley outside a nightclub. I can separate my job from my real life but real lives are never more exposed that when examining sexual matters in a criminal court.
Sexual offending is not new. Numerous cases of historic sexual offending have been uncovered across the world. Commonly perpetrators are found in positions of trust or authority – parents, priests, teachers etc. In the past there was little effort to investigate such matters properly, children were disbelieved and cases were not pursued. Nowadays, people feel much more able to complain and allegations of historic abuse are coming regularly before the courts. Anyone who is the victim of past abuse can still go to the police and frankly should. Without a complaint, there is nothing to investigate.
Jimmy Savile may have been a monster or a man of his time, the BBC may or may not be held to account for failing to protect children on their programmes. Those who failed to act will have to live with themselves forever but arguably the courts and the justice system were not to blame. Parliament made the laws that so failed to protect young women and those laws were debated by men who mixed with the likes of Jimmy Savile. Parents, friends and colleagues passed by inappropriate conduct and failed to act. The courts can only sort out the philanderers from the paedophiles if given the opportunity.
There will be a lot of soul-searching over the coming months and no doubt more sordid details about what went on at Television Centre. Sex crime law has progressed enormously with new laws and procedures but attitudes haven’t changed that much as the recent obsession over the boys from One Direction shows. There is still an appetite for youthful sexual activity. However, not all of it will be unlawful.
Felicity Gerry is a criminal barrister with 36 Bedford Row

Saturday, 20 October 2012

Andrea Davison, Jimmy Savile, SERCO and How it all Fits In With Child Abuse, Covert Arms Shipments and Government Fraud

Details have emerged  from Court Documents and colleagues about  ex spy  Andrea Davison,   who fled the UK in July 2012 after years of persecution by the British Authorities.  Continuing the persecution  DC 2056 Robinson of the   Derby Police recently told Andrea Davison's stalker, Internet troll Gordon Bowden,  where she was.   The Derby Police   told him she is living  in  Argentina and was not, as widely speculated,  in the Ecuador Embassy  with Julian Assange.


Andrea  was well known in Parliament and in the Media as a superlative investigator into covert arms deals, financial corruption and paedophilia in the Police, the Judiciary and the Government.  She rose to notoriety   during the 90’s when she was at the forefront of exposing the Conservative Government’s  secret and illegal arms deals to Iraq.  Working with the strange and enigmatic Spy Frank Machon  she was given  thousands of documents to prove the covert supply line and sent on a mission to expose to the Labour party that the Conservative Government was illegally selling arms to Iraq and Iran.


During the first Gulf war Andrea had been involved in drops  behind enemy lines when they called up all the reserves.  The  flights went  from RAF  Valley air base in Anglesey North Wales which is close to her home and  now has a famous Airman stationed Prince William.  Her  group used SAS bases in Iraq without their knowledge and went deep into Iraq to take out traitors working for the Iraqis and to meet up  with their own agents.  Due to these  missions her thyroid was damaged  because of  the Chemical and  Biological weapons deployed  on the Iraqi front lines.  Damage to the Thyroid effects every cell in the Body  and is a creeping  disease which, without medication,  slowly debilitates and then kills.

Around this period Andrea also found time to  work tirelessly  to investigate   paedophiles named by victims  in the Police  and the establishment  such as Tory Peter Morrison MP,  and Tory Derek Laud.  Both were close friends of  Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a close friend of Jimmy Savile  who recently was exposed as a paedophile.   She started to work with the then shadow Home Secretary Tony Blair who tried to get the then Home Secretary Kenneth Clarke to take action against the Police.   But Clarke who years later as Justice Secretary would  make sure Andrea  was prevented from having a fair trial refused to help and instead protected the paedophiles in his Government and in the Police.   Last Month Ben Fellows accused Clarke of being a paedophile

Andrea   and  journalist Pete Sawyer continued the exposure through Scallywag magazine  who’s co founder, and editor of its successor Spiked, Angus James Wilson,  died mysteriously  in Cyprus around 1996.   Scallywag  also exposed  that MI5 took foreign diplomats and important people  to the North Wales homes and secretly filmed them abusing and torturing boys to use the tapes for blackmail. This is a classic Intelligence modus operandi with regard to child abuse by the famous and influential – especially politicians that they want to control.  The cover-up of  child abuse  over decades indicated the hand of the State Agencies.    This all linked covert arms deals and child abuse.

In Interviews victims had named a number  of police officers  including Fraud Squad officer DC Stephen Winnard  who later arrested Andrea in 2010, senior judges,  celebrities,  and Politicians  including,  Derek Laud, McAlpine and Peter Morrison and also the Duke of Westminster. Victims claimed  they were collected from the Children's Homes in expensive cars, including  Jimmy Savile's  Rolls Royce and taken to be abused by an elite paedophile ring.  These interviews  and other evidence were kept  by Andrea.

Jimmy Savile routinely used his paedophile connections in the police to silence his victims and critics. An expensive onyx table lighter was inscribed: “To Jimmy Savile from his friends at the Fraud Squad 

 Surrey Police protected Jimmy Savile

From 1991-1993 the North Wales Police mounted a huge retrospective investigation and subsequently referred some 800 allegations to the Crown Prosecutions Service.  Fewer than 3% of these referrals proceeded to trial, much to the dismay and mystification of many of the alleged victims and of the adults who knew the extent and nature of the alleged abuse

But the clamour for something to be done would just not stop. Following  several  internal council reports; an inquiry for the Welsh Office concluded that a full judicial inquiry would not be in the public interest. The Government were trying to keep the lid on the scandal.  

But eventually in 1994  a report was ordered  to be prepared for Clwyd council  into the abuse and Mr Jillings from Derbyshire Social Services  was ordered to make a full report into the abuse in Children’s Homes.  But  the Council  and the Government (Welsh Office)  refused to publish the  report because it dammed the Police, the care system, politicians  and implicated the Government.  The council pulped every copy of the report or so they believed.

November  7th Update:  from former Welsh Office Minister Rod Richards.

Then in 1995  the story  broke into the main stream  when the Independent  HTV and Private Eye publicised the abuse. The Government Knew they would have to appear to do something

 Waterhouse Report Graphic

So  much to the Tory Government's dismay the scandal  just would not go away and  in 1996  the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal of Inquiry was announced  by William Hague, then Secretary of State for Wales.  The announcement followed more than a decade of abuse allegations, counter allegations, police investigations, the conviction of a handful of former social workers, the broken promise of a public inquiry, the suppression of at least one damning report on abuse in children’s homes in North Wales, and mounting public and political concern.   The Waterhouse Tribunal  of  Inquiry was commissioned but  the judge instigated  severe reporting restrictions  and offered  immunity from prosecution to  paedophiles who gave evidence and so was a total whitewash. Solicitors working for the inquiry made victims delete the names of their abusers from their statements.  The  Judge also  made it contempt of court for anyone to publish the names of the paedophiles including senior Tory abusers  and so the names could never be spoken.   The police Officers, Solicitors, Judges and Politicians accused by the victims were never  arrested or questioned.

Inquires are used by  Government's to placate the people, they stem criticism,  stop press speculation and limit the damage.  The Government controls  the judges and the evidence  but appears to actually be doing something.  The Other benefit of an Inquiry is they take years and by the end of that time interest has dropped away.  So the evidence against the Police, Senior Judges, Derek Laud, Peter Morrison and others  plus  a rare pirate copy of the Jilling report  lay gathering dust  in Andrea's home until one of the accused DC Stephen Winnard  and DS Hunt of the Derby Police  together with officers from the North Wales Police Seized them.The documents have never been returned. 

One  Solicitor  and BBC and S4C  TV Sports Presenter  Nic Parry  represented some of the Paedophiles accused of systematic child abuse.  Whilst  Andrea,  who was a trained Mental Health Advocate volunteered to represent  some of the victims.  Nic Parry dismissed the allegations  saying  to his colleagues in the  BBC 
"Our concern at the start of this major inquiry is that perhaps public opinion has swayed the balance far too greatly in favour of those who make allegations of abuse and the understandable anxiety to look after their needs and care may outweigh justice."    
Nic Parry Became a Crown Court Judge in 2010  and it was Judge Niclas Parry who was later to sentence Andrea in her absence to Two and Half  years  for fraud after he admitted no-one had lost any money,       read more JUDGE NICLAS PARRY  ANDREA DAVISON  WAT...

In 2002  following instructions she had begin a small  business  which could be used to gather Intelligence.   In 2004  she  discovered  that Mr Brock a senior financial controller of NATO was defrauding NATO. Mr Brock pleaded guilty in 2004   but the people behind Mr Brock could not be prosecuted.   It was after this that Andrea’s illness began to manifest   leaving  her weak and mentally confused.  Undiagnosed this illness  put her out of operations for a number of years and increased her  natural paranoia.

Late 2009 she felt  able to  began a new investigation and  was instructed  to look into  SERCO and who really owned Britain Nuclear deterrent. Silent Players were  making  fortunes from the grant of lucrative contracts involving billions of tax payer’s money and other secret money which appeared to be gathered from Government sponsored International fraud. SERCO was winning contracts in every area of British life from emptying the bins in Milton Keynes to running  Prisons and providing probabtion services. Its power was staggering and it was slowly and incrementally taking over the Criminal Justice System.

Evidence indicated   people in SERCO  were  covertly  selling nuclear technology to anyone who would pay  and  in   2009 a massive on-going fraud network began to surface possibly  linking the City of London Police and SERCO with frauds around the Globe. But just as this evidence was being compiled in January 2010 the Derby Fraud Squad working with the City of London Police Raided her small flat and removed all the evidence. At the same time they stole thousands of documents on arms to Iraq, the Jillings report  and interviews with the victims of sexual abuse naming Police Officers and High profile abusers.

Then followed years of persecution  by the Derby Police and the State culminating in a trial in her absence, allegedly  about documents the police had seized in January 2010 two and a half years earlier. During the trial   there was no mention of SERCO or the paedophiles  or the thousands of documents on Arms to Iraq.  The Prosecution called in the Barrister Felicity Gerry whom they could trust to withhold evidence.

Felicity Gerry rose to fame in 2011 when  it emerged  she had lied to the Crown Court in Nottingham   to get the Ratcliff  Power Station Activists  convicted.  Gerry  acting  for the Prosecution  was directly responsible for the conviction of the   Ratcliff power station activists.  Following their conviction the activists appealed  and during the hearing  of their  appeal it  emerged  that Gerry's key  witness Mark Stone was actually an undercover cop  Mark  Kennedy.   Kennedy  had given  evidence using a false name and  was using  false ID  to live  undercover as Mark  Kennedy.  He was using  different identities and false ID  and had been committing  acts of terrorism   and other crimes for years all sanctioned by the Police.

Corrupt Barrister Felicity Gerry convinced  a jury that intelligence agent  Andrea Davison  was a bad person because she used different identities, although no-one had lost any money because of this. Gerry  also  convinced judicial investigators that Mark Kennedy was acting perfectly normally because as an  undercover Police officer  he was entitled to use false ID and different names and commit serious crimes.  You could not make it up!

Bringing the case against Gerry up to date  we have two  stories.   1)   5th of April 2012  Despite an IPPC investigation no-one was charged with misconduct in public office and Gerry was not prosecuted or disbarred for lying to the Court

2)  October the 11th 2012 Felicity Gerry wrote an article  published in  the Times Newspaper entitled 'Jimmy Savile the Case for the Defence'  in which she defended Jimmy Savile.   These Paedophiles have no fear  because they are fully protected by the Police and the Courts and by SERCO who runs major parts of the Criminal Justice System.

Fortunately Andrea Davison was not without friends  and  although DC Stephen Winnard gloated  to  Andrea's stalker Gorden Bowden  "we have seized her passport"  she easily  managed to  escape  from the United Kingdom and fly to the safety  of Argentina.  Andrea is now believed   to be writing a  very revealing book   and script together with a well know author.  The Movie should be a thriller.

One question arises,  on who's behalf  did  the British police prosecute an important British Intelligence Agent and who in the Tory Government authorised it?   Something must be very wrong in the United Kingdom!   It appears to me that  Andrea is part  of  a Secret Intelligence war   and who can tell who is working for who? 


 I found this Blog  highlighting  abuses by the United Kingdom State it gives details about the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC). Which the blog claims is used to incarserate political prsioners.

Stateing that the FTAC  " is what the British government use to oppress those who would stand against it. It locks people up in mental hospitals and abuses them. The FTAC hide behind a façade of removing ‘ill’ people who are a threat to prominent people, but it is also used to ‘disappear’ those that would speak out about government abuses"

The blogger who appears to have been totally silenced as the last blog is in 2010   gave an nterview to Chris Summers of the BBC

 Also featured the tragic story of Vet Maurice Kirk  see you tube video

If  you start to read the blogs  the heart rending story emerges:-


"It is now the eighth week of my imprisonment. However, it feels a lot longer. This is because I feel it on a 24 / 7 basis. Every moment of waking thought is a torture; the only relief is the hours that I can remain asleep. Such a life is soul destroying. It saps the will to live out of me. I am so unhappy here.

There is nothing to do. I do not overtly complain; I have learned that there is no point and can be counter productive as it is used again you. When I am asked how I am I reply ‘bored’ and the suggestion is that I take part in the activities on the ward. Those ‘activities’ comprise of watching trash TV; having cups of tea made in a filthy kitchen (caused by the other prisoners); or, for others, having a smoke. There is very little else to do. I do have some books to read, but I have lost motivation to read. My access to the internet is limited to late afternoons or evenings. I hate to lay in bed all day, but that is all I have open to me. This is why time passes so slowly.

The medical ‘treatment’ that I get is a fortnightly injection of some anti-psychotic drug. That is it. Once a week in the ward round there may be a few questions, but nothing meaningful. This is evidence that I am held here as a punishment for my blogs and not for any medical reasons.

Just often and for how long I will be able to blog I don’t know. I expect that as soon as they spot that I have made a post I shall be banned from using the internet again.

Why can’t they actually talk to me properly? They will find out that all I want to do is write my little computer programs that analyse financial data, write reports on the results, and publish them on a subscription basis from my website. 

As I keep saying: All I wanted to do was to have earned a living in peace.

Update: I have been told that my internet surfing has to be restricted now.

And the final blog dated  Novemeber 2010  states  simplet  "the End has come"
Who is this blogger and what happened to  him?

Sunday, 14 October 2012


Man arrested for email he didn't write, council and police believe they acted correctly

A businessman was arrested at home in front of his wife and young son over an email which council officials deemed ‘offensive’ to gipsies – but which he had not even written.

The email, concerning a planning appeal by a gipsy, included the phrase: ‘It’s the 'do as you likey' attitude that I am against.’

Council staff believed the email was offensive because ‘likey’ rhymes with the derogatory term ‘pikey’.

The 45-year-old IT boss was held in a police cell for four hours until it was established he had nothing to do with the email, which had been sent by one of his then workers, Paul Osmond.

But police had taken his DNA and later confirmed they would be holding it indefinitely.

The businessman, who has asked not to be named, was also fingerprinted in the police investigation estimated to have cost taxpayers up to £12,000.

His computer and other internet equipment were also seized.

The email, from a computer at his company, was sent last August to a website at Rother District Council, in East Sussex, on which the public can comment on planning applications.

It referred to an appeal by gipsy Linda Smith, who wants to keep a mobile home in an area of outstanding beauty overlooking the Battle of Hastings site.

The businessman, a father of two, said last night: ‘I had a sense of total disbelief. My wife and I decided to tell my 11-year-old son I had to go with the police because I had witnessed a road accident.

‘Even though the officers were fairly pleasant to me, I was informed I would be handcuffed if I didn’t go voluntarily. They then confiscated my computer and my wife’s computer and took them to the police station.

‘I was extremely angry. I was relaxing in the comfort of my home on a Sunday afternoon and then I was in a police car under arrest – all for an innocent comment by a colleague.’

He said: ‘I have never had any criminal record and try my best to teach my children right from wrong. This was a ridiculously heavy-handed police reaction to what they perceived as a racist comment. I am not the least bit racist and neither is Paul Osmond. The gipsy family concerned did not complain.

‘I did nothing wrong yet ended up in a police cell for four hours with my DNA stored on a criminal database.’

The case finally ended last week when Mr Osmond, who had been arrested and bailed, was told there would be no further police action. The planning case is continuing.

Mr Osmond, 39, of Icklesham, said: ‘I made it clear to them I am absolutely not racist. I said I was simply registering my objection to this application because it is 200ft from the most important and historical battlefield in the country.

Sussex Police said they had arrested the businessman over ‘suspicion of committing a racial or religious-aggravated offence’.

After consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, it was decided to take no further action against Mr Osmond.

Chief Inspector Heather Keating said: ‘Sussex Police have a legal duty to promote community cohesion and tackle unlawful discrimination.

‘We are satisfied we acted appropriately in identifying the owner of the computer used and through this, the identity of the writer of the offending line.’

Police said they would hold the innocent men’s DNA indefinitely, which they said was in line with national policy.

A council spokesman said: ‘As far as we were concerned it was an offensive comment, so we got in touch with the police.’

Elderly Lady faced prosection for dropping cigarett ash

70 year old widow threatened with £2,500 fine for smoking a cigarette

Sheila Martin, a 70 year old widow living in Oldbury, has been warned that she could be prosecuted and face a fine of £2,500, plus costs, for smoking a cigarette at a bus stop.

While waiting for the number 446 bus on May 26, 2010, Mrs Martin decided to enjoy a cigarette.

During the course of enjoying here cigarette, she was approached by an official from Sandwell Council, who issued her with a £75 fine for 'littering', due to some ash falling from Mrs Martin's cigarette end.

She said: "I still can't believe what happened. I was just sat at a bus stop quietly enjoying my cigarette and from nowhere a warden appeared and accused me of littering. I couldn't believe it, I was only smoking a cigarette. It is one of the few things I have left that I can afford to buy myself. I can't work out why the council would be so vindictive over such a petty matter. I'm so upset and angry."

Mrs Martin refused to pay the £75 fine, and has now the elderly widow has been issued with a 'Final Warning' from Sandwell Councils Prosecution Team, threatening her with prosecution, and a fine of up to £2,500.

Mrs Martin has vowed to fight on, and has stated that she would rather go to prison than pay this ridiculous charge.

Last year, an official from Sandwell Council issued a mother with a £75 fine, for feeding ducks with her son in a park.

Saturday, 13 October 2012

Daniel Morgan the Metropolitan Police the News of the Screws and the UK Police State


In September the Independent wrote  an article  about Lord Stevens  former  head of the Metropolitan Police (why do they make police officers lords?) it revealed that Mr Stevens was  the target of the News of the World because he had  been using  the Police helicopter   at tax payers expense to visit his Mistress

The News of the Screws employed a private investigation firm Southern Investigations which had been set-up by Daniel Morgan in 1984 who was later to be murdered by the Police in 1987.   The Indi failed to mention Daniel Morgan in  their article.

On 10 March 1987 after having a drink with Jonathan Rees, his partner in Southern Investigations, at the Golden Lion pub in Sydenham, Morgan was found dead in the pub car park next to his car, with an axe wound to the back of his head.  His  wallet had been left and a large sum of money was still in his jacket pocket. The pocket of his trousers had been torn open and notes he had earlier been seen writing were missing. Subsequently a match to the DNA sample found on Morgan's trouser pocket was  made.

Daniel  Morgan  was  investigating drug-related police corruption in south London before his death.

Detective Sergeant Sid Fillery, stationed at Catford police station, was assigned to the case but did not reveal to superiors that he had been working unofficially for Southern Investigations. In April 1987 six individuals including Sid Fillery and Jonathan Rees, the brothers Glenn and Garry Vian and two  police officers   were arrested on suspicion of murder but all were eventually released without charge.

But  investigations  into Daniels  murder  ended  24years later  in a trial in 2011.  During last years  trial the three people  charged  were set free when the trial collapsed  because the Prosecution Barristers and police had corruptly made sure they did not disclose  evidence.  The System protected its own from conviction.  Had they been innocent they would most certainly have been convicted.

Lord Stevens, the commissioner of the Metropolitan Police from 2000 to 2005, was tailed by Southern Investigations  who were  working for the tabloid in 1999, shortly before he took charge of London's police force.

According to Derek Haslam, a former undercover police officer who infiltrated Southern Investigations for Scotland Yard, the agency wanted to use the sensitive information to "control" Lord Stevens. Mr Haslam said: "I told my handler, 'You'd better tell him they are on to him and they are looking at anything'. They saw filth on police and politicians as a way to control them."  Halsam   a clever  lier  as are all undercover  police officers  and he   covered up the most important  evidence. He knew who had murdered Daniel Morgan  and he know the name of the Police officer who wielded the axe that killed Mr Morgan.  Part of his brief in   Southern Investigations was  to make sure none of the crimes the Met conducted would  come out into the light of day.

Jonathan Rees, Daniel Morgans partner  in Southern Investigations, rejected that allegation made by Haslam as "absurd" but confirmed the surveillance took place. In an interview with, he said: "We were given instructions and an allegation that he was using a Met Police plane from Biggin Hill to see his mistress in Northumbria,
Mr Haslam claimed that during his nine years as a "mole" inside Southern Investigations, he told the Yard that the company was committing crimes – often on behalf of the News of the World. In briefings to investigators, he said he told the Met that Southern Investigations was "a corrupt organisation that was corrupting police officers and illegally accessing all sorts of confidential information".

"I told my handlers that MPs, ministers and Home Secretaries were targets," he said. "They fell into two categories: one they could earn money from and the other was to use blackmail, influence, to do their own thing. Anything that put the Met in a bad light, or anybody they could infiltrate or put in a bad light. It was about money and influence."

Mr Rees described Mr Haslam's allegations as "nonsense", saying that police wanted to smear Southern Investigations at a time that it was uncovering police corruption on behalf of the press. He said: "Haslam was tasked by senior officers to... come in there and mix with us again and... to find out... what we were doing against CIB3 [the Met's anti-corruption unit]... they knew we were investigating CIB3... it was a force within a force, they were given total autonomy to do whatever they liked... history tells us that when you allow policemen to do that it goes wrong."

Well now just who do we believe?

Everyone knows that the UK police as a body are utterly corrupt. the  police have taken over  the function  of the intelligence services and use the same tactics. This  has  been revealed in the Levesen Inquiry. Police prime Journalists and Bloggers with disinformation in order to traumatise  and harass their targets.

The Courts and the Police as a body are now totally corrupt. With the Anti terrorist squad behind  acts of terrorism, the fraud squad behind  massive government sponsored fraud to fund covert ops and covert projects like Britain’s Nuclear Deterrent.   The Courts  act  as the cover-up department. No-one in the UK can have a fair trial if the  Police want them silenced. No-one can be convicted in the UK if the State want them free to commit more crimes on  behalf of the State.  The UK has turned Justice on it head.

The UK government has developed a system which they can use now to target anyone they fear may expose their multi level criminal enterprises.   Sadly  the Government  cynically and evilly use  child abuse as a means to control and manipulate  players in their  criminal empire.

The murder of Daniel Morgan  because it could not be simply ignored  has led the Police the CPS and Courts to weave a twisted web of deception which has exposed their inner workings.

Profile: Lord Stevens
Lord Stevens was seen on Fleet Street as an old-fashioned "thief-taker" who would restore confidence in the Met, battered by the Macpherson Report into the death of Stephen Lawrence.
In an attempt to bolster media support, he dined several times with newspaper editors, including the News of the World's Rebekah Brooks. When he left after five years in 2005, confidence in the police was at a 10-year high.
He then wrote a column for the News of the World called The Chief, which was ghost-written by the paper's deputy editor, Neil Wallis. Lord Stevens received £5,000-£7,000 per column.