Sunday, 29 November 2015

Could Police CPS and Judges make it any more obvious they work for a failed state and have no interest at all in Justice?

Surveillance operation targeting sister of former paratrooper killed by racist  police  'not properly authorised'   but the Crown Prosecution Service refuse the charge  the 4 police officers who spied on her. CPS wrote to Janet Alder saying it won’t charge four senior police officers after finding lack of sufficient evidence to secure misconduct conviction.  Lack of evidence ? They admitted organizing an operation to spy on her and her solicitor and barrister.  

 Janet Alder has been trying for 16 years to find out what happened to her brother Christopher Alder who died in Police custody.   What happened! the Police launched a campaign to spy on her and her legal representatives. The Courts and the Prosecution service protected the police who killed her brother and then spied on her.  The three organs of the state have conspired to cover up the murder of Christopher and the persecution of his sister Janet.

All Janet wanted was the truth about how her brother  former Paratrooper Christopher Alder. He died in Police custody  with his trousers around his ankles, handcuffed and face down  in  the custody suit.   He chocked to death whilst police officers parodied monkey noises.  The State then stole his body  and substituted  the body of an old lady to give to his family  for burial.  Janet and her Family who had buried  Christopher  with honor found out 10 years later the State still had Christopher's body. 
Image result for christopher alder murdered

 Janet Alder, sister of Christopher Alder, said: ‘I feel terrorised by the state.’  Terrorised! I should think so. 

The sister of a former paratrooper who was unlawfully killed in a police station has described how she felt “terrorised by the state” after it was revealed that up to 14 police officers were deployed to spy on her. The police operation targeting Janet Alder, which included surveillance and allegedly at least one attempt to eavesdrop on a conversation with her barrister, was not properly authorised, prosecutors said.
Police spied on Alder after she began campaigning to uncover the details of her brother Christopher’s death in a Hull police station in April 1998. One of the most controversial deaths in police custody, it inspired a decade-long quest for the truth. “I am absolutely appalled,” Alder told the Guardian. “I feel terrorised by the state.”

Prosecutors examining claims that police spied on sister after death of her brother

In a letter sent to her on Thursday, the Crown Prosecution Service said it had decided not to charge four senior officers in charge of the surveillance after concluding that there was not enough evidence to secure a conviction of misconduct in public office. But it outlined evidence showing that surveillance officers followed Alder, her barrister and her supporters after a July 2000 hearing of the inquest into her brother’s death. The CPS said that there was evidence that part of the surveillance team followed them to her hotel, while other members tracked another group to a car park.
The second-in-command of the operation told an internal police inquiry that “somebody went for a drink with a solicitor. One remit was to try and overhear the conversation.” That comment “raises significant concern”, the CPS added, as eavesdropping on legally protected conversations between a lawyer and their client is “improper and unlawful”.
Alder said that ever since she started campaigning over her brother’s death, she had feared that the police were monitoring her. “It just confirmed everything I thought and that I was not being paranoid,” she said. “I never in my life knew anything like this - I always believed that the system did the right thing. For that to happen to me, it was so scary. I was just a normal working-class woman looking after my kids.”
With regard to the decision not to charge senior officers, a CPS spokeswoman said: “Any prosecution would rely heavily on the evidence of police officers involved in the surveillance. As the events happened 15 years ago, the majority of the witnesses spoken to had, at best, a limited recollection of events.”
The CPS added that there was no “clear or reliable evidence” that the police had eavesdropped on her and her barrister. “This decision was supported by advice from external counsel,” it added.
The inquest in 2000 decided that Christopher Alder, a 37-year-old father of two,had been unlawfully killed. The Falklands veteran died in April 1998 handcuffed and face down on the floor of a Hull police station surrounded by police officers, after choking on his own vomit.
CCTV footage recorded him gasping for breath as officers chatted and joked around him. They believed that Alder, whose trousers and pants had been pulled down to his ankles, was play-acting. Monkey-like noises could be heard as Alder lay dead.
Five police officers put on trial for manslaughter and misconduct in public office were cleared on the orders of a judge two years later. Humberside police apologised to the family for failing to “treat Christopher with sufficient compassion”. 

 Christopher Alder died in April 1998 handcuffed and face down on the floor of a Hull police station surrounded by police officers, after choking on his own vomit. Photograph: Rex Shutterstock
Four years ago, it emerged that Alder’s family had buried an elderly woman instead of Christopher after his body was discovered in a hospital mortuary.
The surveillance was revealed after a Humberside detective constable who was part of the operation directed against Alder come forward to her superiors two years ago. She acted after revelations that undercover police had spied on the family and supporters of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence.
A two-year investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission found that police had authorised undercover surveillance of protesters outside the inquest at Hull crown court. Senior officers authorised the surveillance of the protesters, known as Operation Yarrow, for the whole of the six-week inquest. Officers were told to use “mobile, foot and technical surveillance”.
Police anticipated that controversy over the paratrooper’s death might result in public disorder, according to the CPS. There was evidence, however, that “members of a surveillance team were directed to undertake, and did undertake, surveillance with a broader remit than that allowed for in the authorisations,” the CPS said. It added that mobile and technical surveillance “was not properly authorised” because it took place away from the court and commenced before it was meant to.
Piers Arnold, an official in the CPS senior crime and terrorism division, wrote: “It is difficult to see how any such targeted surveillance could have been justified or directed at issues of public order which was the written justification for each of the surveillance authorities.
“Following the family of an alleged victim of police negligence/brutality and their legal representative instructed for an ongoing inquest into that death, whether or not it involved eavesdropping, would involve a high level of intrusion and require good reasons. No such reasons are discernible from the evidence.” But he added that the evidence on who ordered the surveillance was too unclear to start a prosecution. The CPS believed that it was not possible to establish a motive for the surveillance.
Alder said: “The police were trying to deflect attention away from the unlawful killing verdict of the inquest.”
A spokeswoman for Humberside police said: “We note the decision of the Crown Prosecution Service, which the family of Christopher Alder has the right to appeal.”
Police have come under growing criticism for covertly monitoring grieving families who have challenged their misconduct. An official report disclosed last year that undercover police officers had gathered intelligence on 18 families who had highlighted allegations of police wrongdoing. They include the parents of Stephen Lawrence, who was killed by a racist gang in 1993.
Undercover officers also gathered intelligence on the relatives of Jean Charles de Menezes, the Brazilian electrician mistakenly shot dead by police in the aftermath of the 2005 terrorist attacks on London, and on Cherry Groce, who was shot and paralysed by police in a raid on her home in 1985.
The death of 20-year-old student Ricky Reel, who in 1997 was found in a river after abuse by racists, also prompted intelligence operations on relatives.
The undercover operations are to be examined at a public inquiry by Lord Justice Pitchford, which will scrutinise the theft of child identity and police spies’ relationships with targeted women. Police have said intelligence on family campaigns was collected accidentally by undercover officers tasked with infiltrating political groups.

These evil people who work for the failed UK State could not make their hatred towards truth and justice more obvious! 

Friday, 13 November 2015

Cavendish MI6 admits to torturing a child

The naked child was held down on a table by three Police officers and tortured whilst Cavendish fielded the questions.

"through the boys screams and sobs came the information needed"  Cavendish wrote 

Inside Intelligence by Anthony Cavendish. Is he trustworthy?

Anthony Cavendish wrote his book Inside Intelligence, specifically to defend his friend Maurice Oldfield from what he called slurs  from MI5. He also got his friend GK Young to write the Foreword [7]. Cavendish says President Bush sent a letter to wish him good luck with the book.
Cavendish, Oldfield and Young had been MI6 and Oldfield was the first senior person to transfer services and became Security Coordinator for MI5 in Northern Ireland, after retiring from MI6.
cav2 001
I am not sufficiently informed, certainly without further study, to ascertain the truth about Maurice Oldfield nor GK Young, although a subsequent post will include information about Oldfield from Cavendish.
Jonathan Aitken once said about Cavendish “James Bond was a rather dull weakling by comparison” .
cav1 001
From his book what do we learn about what kind of man Anthony Cavendish was?
As a 23 year old, he seduced a 19 year old girl who wanted to stop spying and he sent her back to her death.
gen3 001
He oversaw the torture of a young arab boy, so badly that the boy could not walk.gen4 001
He was prepared to go to any lengths to achieve the objects of the service (MI6)
gen5 001
Cavendish touched on his own early homosexual experiences in Switzerland.
cav11 001
Cavendish thought that homosexuals were invariably prima donnas with regards to their work.
page65 001
Cavendish was aware of two of his colleagues in Germany who were caught abusing young boys, and helped cover up a friend of a friends child abuse who was “of use “.
gen6 001
As are others in MI6, Cavendish was an accomplished liar and the following page says that as the years go by the lies take over from the truth and [his] morality accepted what it had to do. Blackmail was just part of the MI6 repertoire, useful especially for aquiring agents caught with small boys.
gen1 001
gen2 001Blackmail is of course a crime [8] and if the law applied equally these blackmailers should be tried.
Cavendish and Mrs Thatcher
Cavendish’s sole purpose for his book was to defend Oldfield from charges of practising homosexuality. Even from what Cavendish writes about himself, it raises questions about his knowledge of homosexuals and his own morality and trustworthiness.
A subsequent post will include some pages of Cavendish’s defence of Oldfield.
Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers.  National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups. Other useful sites are One in Four [C]  and Havoca [D]. Useful post on Triggers[E]  from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog. Jim Hoppers pages on Mindfulness [G]  and Meditation [H] may be useful.
[2] 2013 Jan 23 Guardian Anthony Cavendish obituary Former MI6 officer who chronicled his exploits as a secret agent in Inside Intelligence
[4] 2013 Mar 12 Independent Anthony Cavendish: Intrepid intelligence officer who fought terrorism in the Middle East by Tarn Dalyell
[5] 2013 Jan 18 The Times Obituary Anthony Cavendish
[6] 2015 Nov 4 Needleblog John Mann MP On Wanless Review And Dickens File
[7] 2015 Nov 11 CathyFox Blog George K Young – Foreword in “Inside Intelligence by Anthony Cavendish”
[8] e -Lawresources Blackmail
[F] SurvivorsJustice Blog
[G] Jim Hopper Mindfulness
This is all written in good faith but if there is anything that needs to be corrected please email

Sunday, 8 November 2015

The Government should Stop selling our Kids

Stop Selling our Kids – Maggie Tuttle

Stop Selling Our Kids
Original published on November 6, 2015 by  Children Screaming to be Heard [1] 
I can only smile if you send me back to the people who love me and I do not want to be sold by private companies “In a child’s best interest” because they will never return me home to where my heart belongs.
Privatisation “In a child’s best interest” has been planned for years, the  problem is that people have not been aware that for many years social services have been employing their own outside companies and for this reason we have thousands of social workers who are employed and still paid by social services, whilst at the same time using their own companies for assessments and housing of kids when they leave the system.
Many social workers who own their own companies are breaking the law as it is a severe conflict of interest. Time for families to check out there social workers and bring charges.
 The Prison System
The Prison system was at one time run by the government and has been privatised, In 1972 It came to my attention of the plight of men and women in prisons  and for the families and children of prisoners who were only allowed contact once a month for 20 minutes and on contacts there were no facilities whatsoever.
In the present day many families have contact in a contact centre with very little facilities, sitting in a tiny room with a supervisor writing everything down. You might be forgiven for asking why they write it all down by hand instead of recording it, and some people believe it is because this gives them and their superiors the opportunity to alter the notes at a later date to enable them to suggest to the courts that contacts were negative. The family courts will always accept “evidence” obtained in this manner and yet frown on families who try to record everything. For many families contacts can be as little as three times a year and for most Grandparents there is no contact at all, only a book to fill in of their life stories.
The Paedophile Exchange (PIE) in the 80 s was put on the Governments back burner until Cameron became the Prime Minister and it is now a law. SEX EDUCATION ACT for all children in schools from the age of 4/5 to learn about sex when in reality the sex education act is the grooming of children and here we have the Paedophile Information Exchange from the 80s now a law in 2015 with many in Governments as recently reported by the media wanting the laws changed so kids can have sex from an early age.
From the recent research from when the sex education act became law the figures of children committing sex crimes has risen, so here we have the detention centres again privately owned with referrals from the care system and the NHS filling the beds with kids who then at the age of 18 are sent to prisons.
Many children in the care system when they reach the age of 16, their families are told under the mental health act your child will now have to stay in the adult care system for the rest of their lives. When children are dragged from many loving families on allegations only it is normal for the child to cry and be naughty, they want to go home, so social services and many “hired gun” experts write reports that the child has learning and behaviour problems. Many kids are put on drugs and many kids are also moved from foster carers and adoption people due to allegations mostly of behaviour problems,
Back to my days of changing the prison system, at the time people were not aware that prisoners were used as cheap labour for PRINDUS  known as the prison industry. Woolworths had all garden furniture made in Pentonville Prison, Burtons used to have all of their suits made in prisons, Gartree Prison had a department for making screws and bolts it goes on and on and the prisoners received a few pounds a week and the Governments were making mega bucks whilst telling the nation how much it cost the tax payers to keep a man in prison. I reported to the prison department the amount of drugs being taken into prisons and used by the prisoners the answer from the head of the prison department was
Yes we are aware, but if we stop the drugs we will have a riot on our hands.
But then just like the kids in care, prisoners were also used for drug experiments
Many prisoners are qualified electricians builders plumbers so who maintains the prisons free of charge?
The National Health is on its way to becoming privatised, but then one has to know how Governments plan the years ahead…/how-the-coalition-is-privatising-state-educati…
Does any one really think that the hundreds of thousands of migrants entering the EU just happened overnight, believe me all this has been well  planned long ago, just as Palestine was given back to the Jews after world war 2 and how Dear old Britain gave back India but not before separating it to Pakistan and India, now we have the Syrian war and more killings in Tehran and slowly slowly here comes world war 3,  the same games are played with the  privatisation of the schools, NHS, Prisons Social Services, Housing, Benefit Cuts, and bedroom tax, and do remember they take the kids then make more money from the bedroom tax if you don’t pay it you lose your home and never to get your kids back. WHYyou have no home.
What is amazing is the amount of people who love to watch Coronation St, East Enders, Jeremy Kyle show, Cross Roads, HollyOakes, Emmerdale farm and many more, what the people are not aware of is that all of those programs are aimed at the Nation or the Plebs as the Governments refer to the Nation whilst making more money from the TV programs, one has to hear the comments from them in Governments,
“Idiot people they do not have to watch a TV program all they have to do is to look at their neighbours in real life.
The Jeremy Kyle program is a program for the world to think that every family who loses a child to the system are all equal to the families on the Kyle program, I have written many times to Kyle but no replies, well of course there are no replies Kyle is there to make the money from the Plebs and he is part of the elite.
Maggie Tuttle
Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers.  National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups. Other useful sites are One in Four [C]  and Havoca [D]. Useful post on Triggers[E]  from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog. Jim Hoppers pages on Mindfulness [G]  and Meditation [H] may be useful.
[1] Stop Selling Our Kids Children Screaming to be Heard
[F] SurvivorsJustice Blog
[G] Jim Hopper Mindfulness