Epstein's black book shows the Duke and Duchess of Rutland, living in Belvoir Estate UK. They lived at Belvoir with former MP Harvey Proctor. The Rutlands and Proctor are very close to Ghislaine Maxwell. Mossad agent, pimp and madam of Jeffrey Epstein.
Belvoir Estate
Following a tip-off from Child abuse survivor, Carl Beech, Police searched Belvoir finding a bloodstained school uniform and underwear. They also found a handwritten book about child sex abuse, child abuse images, a whip, restraints a crop and straps. Did they arrest Proctor and the Duke and Duchess? No! they arrested and charged the witness and CSA survivor Carl Beech. Today Carl Beech has been convicted of perverting the course of justice for talking about paedophiles in power and child trafficking.
Serial paedophile Harvey Proctor, to whom the police have returned the bloodstained little boys school uniform and underwear, is suing the Police and his victims.
In the UK VIP paedophiles not only are never investigated when their terrible crimes against children are made public they sue and defraud the Public Purse.
In the 1990s, top policeman Gordon Anglesea was awarded £375,000 in damages after successfully suing news organisations that had linked him to child sexual abuse at Bryn Alyn.
However, Anglesea was guilty.
In October 2016, Gordon Anglesea (above) was found guilty of sexually abusing boys at the North Wales children's home, Bryn Estyn, and at a young offenders institution. ANGLESEA GUILTY; BRYN ESTYN; THE BIGGER PICTURE
Ernest Parke was editor of the North London Press. He published a story naming Lord Euston as a person involved in the boy brothel. And he suggested that a much more important person was involved.
Ernest Parke was a journalist who named a top person involved in a boy brothel.
Ernest Parke, and some of the boys, ended up in prison.
Anonymous 22 July 2019 at 10:27 comments - This absurd outcome was a foregone conclusion from the moment the security services realised these true allegations could no longer be completely 'shut down' absent a suitable show trial, scapegoat, and accompanying targeted propaganda exercise.
Staggeringly prejudicial reporting of the trial and Carl Beech's allegations by the spook-infested corporate media had the intended effect.
Week after week, in article after miserable article, the corporate media demonised Carl Beech and sanctified the 'real' accused: Harvey Proctor, Lord Bramall, the late Greville Janner and the late Edward Heath, etc.
Those establishment figures were consistently portrayed by the newspapers and broadcasters as 'distinguished public servants'; as 'noble gentlemen'; as 'elderly victims' 'crying out for justice', etc. etc.
In a show trial whose outcome was predetermined by the security services, a guilty verdict supports only one conclusion: that the substance of Carl Beech's claims are 100% correct.
When the security services exert resources at the magnitude we've witnessed in the Carl Beech trial - coordinating a UNIFORM NARRATIVE about Mr Beech, his allegations, and the twists-and-turns of the trial through EVERY British newspaper and broadcaster.... the people can be sure that the VIP paedophiles and their allies in the security services are highly rattled.
Beech's allegations - especially their truthfulness, which is what gives them their power to frighten - have terrified the life out of some very important people indeed.
We've all seen the consequences of this: the massive cover-up, and the retribution unleashed on Beech in the form of the media's pathetic attempts at humiliating him (branding him a 'fantasist' ad infinitum, showing his personal photos, etc.)
Bad luck, spooks, assets, and rent-a-hacks. We still believe Carl. You've failed yet again. And we are totally undeterred in our pursuit of justice.
BBC making a massive story of Carl Beech.
That's it folks. It's over. Dossiers lost. Child abuse inquiry delayed. Westminster perverts carry on. Nothing to worry about.
7:08 am - 22 Jul 2019
The 'Jewish' judge kept information hidden from the jury?
Carl Beech, among others, accused Lord Janner of being involved in child sexual abuse. Gilad Atzmon writes:
"In Britain, the independent inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, pretty much collapsed when LORD JANNER became a centre of its focus.
"Lord Janner was a former chairman of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a body that claims to represent British Jews.
"He was also the founder of the Holocaust Memorial Trust.
"Some people, so it seems, are either above the law or beyond scrutiny.
"We may have to admit that in a world where THE LABOUR PARTY is terrorised, in the open, by a foreign lobby, in a world where PENGUIN PRESS stops publishing a book because it referred to the Rothschilds as an 'influential Jewish family', in a world where [THE BBC] is reduced to a Zionist propaganda unit, no one in proximity to power dares to look into the possibility that the intelligence agency of a close ally might have invested millions if not billions of dollars in the formation of a spectacular blackmail apparatus that abused underage children through sex trafficking ..."
Carl Beech says that as a child he was sexually abused by Lord Bramall.
Tony Badenoch, who is leading the prosecution of Carl Beech.
Anonymous, 16 July 2019, writes about the trial of Carl Beech -
"Prosecutor Tony Badenoch QC said:
"'LORD BRAMALL ANSWERED ALL QUESTIONS FULLY AND TRUTHFULLY, gave details, spoke about his life, spoke about things intimately personal to him.
"'Compare what he was to say and the manner in which he was to say it, to this defendant, Carl Beech, shifting, shuffling and lying, and deceiving and dancing and twisting and twirling and running' ..."
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49009446
Bramall.
"Fully and truthfully"?
Ha ha ha. Well, if you say so.
Also, what a cheap and tawdry tactic, if you don't mind my saying so, 'Tone'.
(Tony. Is that what you like to be referred to when you're pretending to be an or'nery man of the people, like?)
To invite comparison between - on one hand - a decorated war veteran of advanced age, with an elite education, a peerage, upper-class speech patterns and mannerisms, associations with royalty, and a heart-rending sob story.
And on the other hand, a visibly weak and traumatised survivor of childhood sexual abuse, who has already admitted to child sex offences and spoken of his undying shame.
A man with no titles, no peerage, no upper-class diction, appearance or mannerisms. No associations with royalty. A man totally unpracticed in functioning at the centre of public attention - in complete contrast to the powerful men he is accusing of the most vile crimes, who got to spend decades mastering their public images whilst performing jobs in the glare of the mass media.
An extremely vulnerable man, having his entire life and every real failing dissected and chewed over with relish by the lip-smacking wolves of the media, who couldn't give a hoot about abused children, torture, and unsolved murders - just so long as they continue to please the cartel.
Carl Beech is accused of damaging the reputation of Jimmy Savile and other top friends of Israel.
It's been like a bear baiting spectacle, staged for the delight of the credulous British public, who - having been fed a pack of lies and slanted impressions for weeks, months and years by the establishment so-called journalists - are now baying for this defendant's blood.
It's sick, but it's also ironic. These were the same tactics allegedly deployed by the likes of Bramall, Harvey Proctor and Edward Heath to avoid detection back in the day. 'Nobody will ever believe those powerless, rough accented boys from the care homes, when powerful, upper-class men like ourselves deny and scoff at everything'.
So the same old wheeze is wheeled out again. And again. And again.
No wonder Britain's paedophile network has been so successful.
Stick a 'Sir', a 'Lord', a 'Dame', a 'Lord Lieutenant' or any other ludicrous title from chivalrous days of yore before or after any common scumbag's name - sprinkle with royal and 'prestigious' charitable associations - and the British public fall for it. Every single time.
But you know that very well, already. Don't you, Tonee? Child abuse organiser Jimmy Savile and Edward Heath.
Carl Beech (Nick) accused former UK Prime Minister Edward Heath, and others, of child abuse.
Carl Beech (Nick) 's Defence counsel Ray Tully tells the NickTrial that it is agreed with prosecution that Wiltshire Police examined Edward Heath’s close-protection logs, but these were missing for a period during 1970’s and 1980’s.
Anthony Royle was MP for Richmond in Surrey, the home of Britain's infamous Elm Guest House child brothel until the year after it was raised by Met police.
His daughter Lucinda features in Epstein's telephone book.
Carl Beech as a child. The police say that 'John', a witness, does not exist. Nick says the Met police were in e-mail contact with 'John'. Witnesses vary their stories?
In May 2019, Carl Beech was put on trial for 'telling lies' about top people. In court, Carl Beech has admitted that he got wrong some of the details of what happened 40 years ago.
Aangirfan has a friend who often tells the tale of his visit, many years ago, to San Diego.
Each time the tale is told, there are slight differences in the details.
Asked why he told Wiltshire Police that he did not know why he passed out during abuse, when he later said that it was because his head was held under water, Carl Beech (Nick) tells the NickTrial: “Some things were just too hard to do at that stage.”
Why did Carl Beech tell Wiltshire Police that he did not know with what the abusers stabbed and burnt his feet, when he later said drawing pins/lighter.
Carl Beech tells the NickTrial that he did not know and was later giving an indication of what he thinks that it may have been.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he wrote in a journal that he never saw John with any bruises and yet also claims that he saw him in hospital, and that he wrote he was a friend at school even though he did not go to school with him.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he told Wiltshire Police that John was not at any of the abuse in London even though he said to the Met (London police) that John was.
QUESTION - If Carl Beech were a "fantasist", making things up, can anyone explain his "random" identification of Stowe School? It just so happens that Stowe is linked to an array of individuals with links to the alleged VIP paedophile network. Clearly Beech isn't making this up.
Carl Beech accepts at the NickTrial that he lied to Wiltshire Police “in certain areas” and that he sent them off to look for what the prosecutor called “a non-existant witness”.
Prosecutor presses Carl Beech to tell #NickTrial about being taken abroad.
Very reluctantly and hesitatingly, defendant says that he was flown... to Paris... on a private 747... but says that he cannot recall who was on the plane.
Prosecutor asks defendant at #NickTrial why when he told the Met (London police) that his step-father raped him for the first time at a wildlife park he made no mention of John.
“Because I didn’t want to tell them about,” is the reply.
Pressed on why he did not tell the Met about John at the wildlife park, defendant becomes tearful at #NickTrial, saying that he not was not prepared to talk about him.
Asked whether it was a lie, defendant says that it was an “omission”.
Mark Watts @MarkWatts_1
Dame Alun Roberts @ciabaudo
