Andrea Davison who risked her life to expose arms to Iraq and paedophilia in England and Wales has been wrongly convicted by the British Government.
Like activists and whistle blowers before her she was targeted by the
State for political reasons. The State spent an estimated 1 millions pounds and
2.5 years pursuing an older lady, who even given what she was
convicted of had harmed no-one at all. She is believed to have been
providing intelligence to Julian Assanges network before she was arrested as the
Mastermind in an international fraud early January 2010.
Claiming Andrea was the Head of a criminal network
gave the Derby Police, headed by DC Stephen Winnard, the excuse
to search her home in North Wales. This was a ploy to
seize from her thousands of documents on arms to Iraq and Iran and
documents which name paedophiles in the police and the government.
They also wanted to silence a lady who, working secretly with
the press, had all but brought down the last Conservative Government.
Fearing Andrea may challenge the legality of their haul of documents
the Derby Police obtained a Restraint Order against Andrea
by lying to a Judge that she was the Mastermind of the
International Fraud. This Restraint Order prevented her paying for
legal advise or assistance and Legal Aid was refused. So from March 2010 until
just before her trial in July 2012 Andrea was denied any legal
advise or assistance. This is strictly against the European Human Rights
Law. They even kept the Restraint Order in place following the trail and
conviction of 13 of the real fraudsters in June 2011. See full details f the fraudsters on this blog.
The fraud is on-going and the fraudsters are living openly in Thailand, The Police have not pursued or even interviewed the men who are still engaged in this on-going Fraud.
The prosecution Barrister Felicity Gerry who claims to be a Human Rights
Barrister was brought in to set-up Andrea in collusion with the Derby Police officers.
It is believed that the Derby and Nottingham police blackmailed Gerry because
of the Mark Kennedy Ratcliff power station case.
Gerry who knew that Mark Kennedy was an undercover cop lied to theCourt. If it were not for undercover cop Mark Stone/Kennedy coming
clean and admitting he had set up the Ratcliff Power Station Activists
then all the innocent activists would have been convicted and
see Daily Mail
Felicity Gerry did not care what lies she told to get the
activists convicted because she was already embroiled deeply in cover-ups and easily blackmailed. She lives in Bedford with her husband
and three children and is said to be involved with paedophiles. How
much senior officers in the Derby police are involved with or support her activities is unclear but Gerry is
often chosen to Defend paedophiles and prosecute activists and whistle blowers. She claims to be an expert of sex crimes. Well that says it all!
A body was set-up to
investigate the Mark Kennedy affair and her role . Gerry
then lied to the commission saying she knew nothing about her witness
Mark Kennedy being an undercover cop. If she had not lied she
would have been given a long prison sentence.
So it was easy for the Derby Fraud Squad to blackmail Gerry into setting up
the innocent older lady Andrea Davison.
The Solicitors Garstangs of London were appointed by the Court against
Andrea's will and they failed to call any of her defence witnesses or
present her volumes evidence proving her innocence to the jury. Important evidence to prove her innocence had
been seized by the Police and they failed to make disclosure of this. The
jury were not told about the thousands of documents on arms to Iraq and evidence of a Paedophile ring that were
seized by the police or the numerous Human Rights abuses Andrea had
suffered at the hands of the Police and the State.
In August of the year of her arrest in January 2010 her friend and neighbour 'spy in a bag' Gareth Williams was murdered in London by the same people who may be out to silence Andrea.
Even after persecuting Andrea for nearly three years they could
not find any evidence that she has caused anyone any loss, or had harmed anyone
and there was no complainant. For example one of the crimes she received a 2 and a half year sentence for was stealing
a passport from the passport office. This was her own passport which she paid
for. The passport office had put a 6 instead of an O in her date of birth and
she has not complained. How could a jury convict someone of theft for
stealing their own passport? they should have realised the police were clutching at straws and had no real evidence against her if they were forced to charge her with stealing her own passport.
She is now seeking Political asylum the same as Julian
Assange and believed to be in Ecuador or in the
I escaped Palestine to come to a country the world believes has a just
and fair legal system only to find it is a country of deep hypocrisy where the
innocent are set-up by the State who have endless resources to silence
those who tell the truth,