Leicestershire child sex abuse inquiry must be reopened

Click to enlarge

Kids For Cash UK has been working with a victim to investigate the wide scale sexual abuse of children in care in Leicester and has quickly found links to the case of convicted social worker, Frank Beck, who died in prison in 1994.

The evidence points to a cover up of children being farmed for sexual abuse, as well as the collusion of social workers and police officers in preventing this from coming to light. There are even indications that some of these children may have been taken to Amsterdam as part of a trafficking network. Despite reporting the crimes to a police detective, a victim, who was raped and abused by multiple males over a five year period, claims to have been told that no one would believe her because she had previously been in trouble with the police.

Given the now established links between the Welsh care homes, paedophiles in Derbyshire and Leicestershire, and now a potential link to the same internationally trafficked trade as provided from care homes in London, the suspicion is that child sex abuse has been facilitated by a national network.

Kids For Cash UK voluntary Chief Executive, David Gale, said, “We have uncovered evidence of collusion between public sector professionals directly involved in the supply of children in care for sexual abuse. A large proportion of those involved in the cover up are freemasons in positions of power and influence. There is evidence of a police informer apparently being immune to investigation despite his association with others involved in the abuse of children.”

“I believe that there are serious questions to be answered about exactly what was being arranged by patrons of the Jolly Miller public house in Leicester which, coincidentally, happens to have been the location of the last sighting of a young girl who became a murder victim. A disturbingly high proportion of the involved victims and abusers appear to have been murdered, committed suicide or have died suddenly.”

Kids for Cash UK is calling for:

1. The reopening of the Leicestershire child sex abuse inquiry

2. The initiation of a coordinated nationwide investigation of child sex abuse by the National Crime Agency

3. Parliamentary committee oversight over both of the above

Gale said, “This is not just about the failure to listen to a victim. This is about substantial amounts of evidence being withheld at virtually every stage of the previous inquiry. There is a pressing need to root out those behind wide scale child sex abuse and the corresponding cover up.”

-ENDS-

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

David Gale | Interim Chief Executive | Kids for Cash UK | w:http://www.KidsForCashUK.org

Kids for Cash UK - protecting vulnerable childre

Jimmy Savile Hospital reports he abused the sick, the injured, the young and the old with impunity

Newly-published reports show the depth of Jimmy Savile's depravity he  sexually assaulted victims aged five to 75 in NHS hospitals over decades.  

Here are the links to the full text of these 

reports https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/nhs-and-department-of-health-investigations-into-jimmy-savile

Here are the key points from the reports, which cover 28 hospitals and include graphic details of his activities.

Victims

Savile sexually assaulted victims as young as five at NHS hospitals - and this happened during decades of unrestricted access, the reports says.

He abused patients in their beds, in corridors and also targeted staff and visitors.

Leeds General Infirmary

Sixty people came forward to say they had been abused between 1962 and 2009. They were aged between five and 75. Thirty-three of the 60 were patients and 19 were children.

A number of organisational failures allowed someone "as manipulative as Savile to thrive and continue his abusive behaviour unchecked for years", the report says.

One 10-year-old boy was sexually assaulted while he waited on a trolley for an X-ray on a broken arm.

Broadmoor Psychiatric Hospital

The report details 11 allegations of sexual abuse, six of them involving patients. Two were staff and three were children, it says.

But the report adds this is likely to be an underestimate.

Abuse of the dead

Inquiry chairwoman Dr Sue Proctor says Savile had an "unwholesome interest in the dead".

She also referred to Savile's claims that large rings he wore were "made from the glass eyes of dead bodies at the mortuary".

It is alleged he posed for photographs and performed sex acts on corpses in the Leeds hospital mortuary.

The report says there is no way of verifying this but Dr Proctor says controls on access were lax.

How claims went unreported

The reports detail how hospital staff "didn't want to hear or believe" what his young victims were saying.

They say Savile had a familiarity with porters and nurses rather than with senior managers, and he threatened he could get people fired if they reported allegations of his abuse.

Key reaction

• Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the reports detailing Savile's abuse were "truly awful", patients had been "let down badly" and he apologised on behalf of the government.
• Peter Watt, national services director at the NSPCC, said it was "hard to believe senior staff could be so blind" to what was happening.
• Lesley McLean, Victim Support's manager for West Yorkshire, said Savile preyed on his victims and many who were children at the time were still "coming to terms with feelings of guilt".
• Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham questioned whether those negligent in public duties, as found to be the case in the reports, should be held to account.

Hospitals in detail

In addition to Broadmoor and Leeds General Infirmary a further 26 reports have also been published:

• St Catherine's Hospital, Birkenhead
• Saxondale Mental Health Hospital
• Portsmouth Royal Hospital
• Dewsbury and District Hospital (including Pinderfields Hospital)
• High Royds Psychiatric Hospital
• Cardiff Royal Infirmary
• Great Ormond Street Hospital
• Exeter Hospital
• Ashworth Hospital
• Barnet General Hospital
• Booth Hall
• De La Pole Hospital
• Dryburn Hospital
• Hammersmith Hospital
• Leavesden Secure Mental Health Hospital
• Marsden Hospital
• Maudsley Hospital
• Odstock Hospital
• Prestwich Psychiatric Hospital
• Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead
• Royal Victoria Infirmary
• Queen Mary's Hospital, Carshalton
• Whitby Memorial Hospital
• Wythenshawe Hospital
• Woodhouse Eaves Children's Convalescent Homes in Leicester
• A report about Wheatfield's Hospice, which is run by the Sue Ryder charity, has also been released.

100 MP's support 'Hillsborough Style" Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse

Update!   Finally MP's from Plaid Cymru join the list and it tops 100 Mp's calling for an Inquiry  full list below


Today 91 MP's Support the Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.  There can be no excuse for any MP not to support the inquiry.  

Child Abuse Whistle-blower  Peter McKelvie  wrote to Cameron

"A starting point would be the admission by the Government Whip, Tim Fortescue, on national television that MP’s and Governments keep allegations of paedophiliac behaviour by their own within house as trade offs – the Dirt Books practice.

The dictionary definition of “abhorrent” is disgusting, despicable, vile
You and the MPs now adopting the standard response bandy that word around as a soundbite but refuse to acknowledge or address how despicable, vile and disgusting it has been for fellow politicians not only to fail to report abuse by a colleague but to throw the net of protection around them so that they can carry on regardless."

List below Courtesy of Ian Pace 

Supporters of an Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in the UK
(The original group of seven MPs who initiated this are italicised). There are some small discrepancies between this list and that maintained by Exaro News, due to different criteria employed as to whether an MP has definitively declared their support or not. I try to point these out where necessary.

Conservatives: 21
Zac Goldsmith (Richmond Park)
Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham)
Bob Blackman (Harrow East)
Graham Brady (Altrincham and Sale West)
Robert Buckland (South Swindon)
Neil Carmichael (Stroud)
Douglas Carswell (Clacton)
Tracey Crouch (Chatham and Aylesforth)
Nick de Bois (Enfield North)
Nadine Dorries (Mid Bedfordshire)
Richard Drax (South Dorset)
George Freeman (Mid Norfolk)
Mark Garnier (Wyre Forest)
Charlotte Leslie (Bristol North West)
Jack Lopresti (Filton and Bradley Stoke)
Sir Peter Luff (Mid Worcestershire)
Jason McCartney (Colne Valley)
Paul Maynard (Blackpool North and Cleveleys)
Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton North)
Henry Smith (Crawley)
Craig Whittaker (Calder Valley)

Exaro are also reporting Gordon Henderson as a supporter (saying he has indicated that to Tim Loughton), but I have been forwarded a generic reply from a constituent (reproduced below), dated 17/6/14; this constituent has since re-written to Henderson and I will update this blog if any further reply is received.

Liberal Democrats: 13
John Hemming (Birmingham Yardley)
Tessa Munt (Wells)
Annette Brooke (Mid Dorset and North Poole)
Paul Burstow (Sutton, Cheam & Worcester Park)
Stephen Gilbert (St Austell and Newquay)
Duncan Hames (Chippenham) (PPS to Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg)
Julian Huppert (Cambridge)
John Leech (Manchester Withington)
Greg Mulholland (Leeds North West)
Adrian Sanders (Torbay)
Ian Swales (Redcar)
Mike Thornton (Eastleigh)
Mark Williams (Ceredigion)

Labour: 48
Tom Watson (West Bromwich East)
Simon Danczuk (Rochdale)
Debbie Abrahams (Oldham East and Saddleworth)
Lyn Brown (West Ham)
Karen Buck (Westminster North, PPS to Ed Miliband)
Richard Burden (Birmingham Northfield)
Martin Caton (Gower)
Katy Clark (North Ayrshire and Arran)
John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead)
Jim Cunningham (Coventry South)
Geraint Davies (Swansea West)
Michael Dugher (Barnsley East)
Natascha Engel (North-East Derbyshire)
Jim Fitzpatrick (Poplar and Limehouse)
Rob Flello (Stoke on Trent South)
Paul Flynn (Newport West)
Yvonne Fovargue (Makerfield)
Mary Glindon (North Tyneside)
Tom Greatrex (Rutherglen and Hamilton North)
Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish)
Huw Irranca-Davies (Ogmore)
Emma Lewell-Buck (South Shields)
Kerry McCarthy (Bristol East)
Catherine McKinnell (Newcastle-Upon-Tyne North)
Khalid Mahmood (Birmingham Perry Barr)
Ian Mearns (Gateshead)
Grahame Morris (Easington)
Lisa Nandy (Wigan)
Sandra Osborne (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock)
Albert Owen (Ynys Mõn)
Teresa Pearce (Erith & Thamesmead)
Toby Perkins (Chesterfield)
Stephen Pound (Ealing North)
Yasmin Qureshi (Bolton South East)
Steve Reed (Croydon North)
Steve Rotherham (Liverpool Walton)
Lindsay Roy (Glenrothes)
Andy Sawford (Corbyn and East Northamptonshire)
Alison Seabeck (Plymouth Moor View)
Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield)
Jim Sheridan (Paisley and Renfrewshire North)
Gavin Shuker (Luton South)
Gisela Stuart (Birmingham Edgbaston)
Mark Tami (Alyn and Deeside)
Karl Turner (Kingston upon Hull East)
Derek Twigg (Halton)
Stephen Twigg (Liverpool West Derby)
Iain Wright (Hartlepool)

Exaro are not listing Lisa Nandy’s name on grounds that the Labour frontbench have to make a collective decision. I received confirmation by e-mail from Nandy on 17/6/14, and permission to quote the comment given below, and as there has been no response to two e-mails asking if her position has changed, I will keep this name on the list unless I hear from her office of a change of position.

Green: 1
Caroline Lucas (Brighton Pavilion)

Respect: 1
George Galloway (Bradford West)

Democratic Unionist Party: 5 (Northern Ireland)
Nigel Dodds (Belfast North)
Jeffrey Donaldson (Lagan Valley)
Dr William McCrea (Antrim South)
Ian Paisley Jr (North Antrim)
Jim Shannon (Strangford)

Social Democratic and Labour Party: 2 (Northern Ireland)
Mark Durkan (Foyle)
Margaret Ritchie (South Down)

Alliance: 1 (Northern Ireland)
Naomi Long (Belfast East)

Other supporters, not sitting MPs

Alan Hazelhurst (UKIP Parliamentary candidate for Wakefield)
Tony McNulty (former Labour MP for Harrow East)
Mike Parker (Plaid Cymru candidate for Ceredigion at 2015 election)
Peter Tatchell (former Green Party parliamentary candidate, Oxford East)

Letter to Cameron

Dear Mr. Cameron,

I write further following my original Open Letter to you of 16th September 2013, to which your office responded on 22nd October 2013 stating that the “Home Office was best placed to respond to the matters you raise”.

I and Dr.Liz Davies, an acknowledged expert on Child Protection, met with Mr. Norman Baker, Minister of State for Crime Prevention at the Home Office on 13th May 2014 to address the “matters” I raised with you, thus we were able to assess for ourselves whether the Home Office was indeed “best placed to respond”.

The meeting with Mr. Baker was an insult to both my and Dr. Davies’s integrity and intelligence but of far greater concern is that it was a true indicator of the Government’s attitude to the survivors of sexual abuse by people in powerful positions of authority such as Members of the Houses of Commons or Lords.

Since that meeting you were asked a PMQ by Duncan Hames MP, on 11th June 2014 which indicated that there is at last a recognition amongst a small but highly significant group of cross-party MPs that there is the need for an Independent Inquiry on a Hillsborough model in to the cover ups over MPs and other powerful individuals linked to government, and there is a growing body of evidence to show that the Home Office is the very last Government Department that you as Prime Minister should have delegated the “matters you raise” to.

In my letter of September 2013 to you, with copies to Mr. Clegg and Mr.Miliband, I wrote the following:-

“I appeal to you to forget your political roles and act as fathers of young children, decent citizens and show the moral courage to stop the cover ups and allow all abusers to face justice regardless of their privileged position in society”

” Until this Government and Parliament are seen by the public to be supporting a full and independent inquiry victims will remain silent and be too frightened to come forward.”

” It would be better if you led such an exercise before it is forced upon you by public demand.
THE LATTER WILL HAPPEN IN TIME “

Survivors and their supporters have gained great strength from the courage of the first 80 MPs from across the parties who have agreed to support the call for a fully independent inquiry in to organised and networked sexual abuse and its cover up over at least 4 decades where members of the Establishment and in particular MPs have been involved.

However in the last 48 hours it has become obvious that your party and possibly your Government is exercising some control over MPs wishes and a “Standard Response” has crept in to letters to constituents who have written to them asking them to support the demand for an Independent Inquiry, repeating word for word the sound bites that started in the Home Office’s first written response to me last November 2013 :-

“Child abuse is an abhorrent crime, no matter when, or where, it occurs. We are committed to tackling it, in whatever form it takes”

This patronising attitude towards survivors is now being repeated in the most recent responses from the likes of Andrew Lansley, Gareth Johnson, Mark Prisk etc.

The issue of the sexual abuse of very vulnerable children should have transcended party politics and three line whips and political self- interest and self- preservation a long time ago.

I note that your Response to Duncan Hames’s PMQ of 11th June indicated that you were fairly satisfied that the Home Secretary and the Home Office’s investigations were suficient in themselves and no other measures were necessary.

It seems that your Government is placing great faith in the Sexual Violence against Children and Vulnerable People National Group.

Do you really believe that the public in this country and, of far greater significance, the survivors of abuse by the most powerful of abusers, will trust the very Government Department ie the Home Office that must face up to the following allegations or facts:-

1. Two Cabinet Ministers who hold or have held positions in the Home Office are under current investigation by a live Police investigation. Another two, now dead, will be the subject of information and before too long evidence that can be presented to an Independent Inquiry with a great deal of confidence.

2. It employed within its Queen Anne’s Gate headquarters the Chairman of the Paedophile Information Exchange and allowed him to co-ordinate its meetings and printing of publicity on a Home Office telephone extension and on Home Office headed notepaper.

3. The Home Office funded the Paedophile Information Exchange for many years and it is alleged that the Government of the time authorised this funding in conjunction with the security services.
I personally tracked down the very senior Home Office employee at the time who has now given a formal statement to the Police.

4. The role played by the Home Office at the time in the concerted attempts to discredit and humiliate the Conservative MP, Geoffrey Dickens, because of what he was threatening to expose, and its current role in failing to identify the contents or whereabouts of the “Dickens Dossiers”.
Parliament itself in an Independent Inquiry will need to look at its behaviour in the way it jeered Geoffrey Dickens and cheered Granvile Janner on their respective re-entry in to the Commons after the allegations against Janner first surfaced.

5 . The long list of decisions taken either by an Attorney General or a Director of Public Prosecutions that it would not “be in the public interest” to continue any criminal proceedings against the likes of Sir Peter Morrison, Sir Cyril Smith and Sir Peter Hayman.
It wouldn’t take an Independent Inquiry too long to conclude that such decisions were taken solely in the interests of Government and Parliament and what was in the public interest was never going to be a consideration.

I note that one of the roles (under the heading of “statutory remit”) allocated to your National Group is:-

“Reducing the risks from abuse of authority and power”.

Under that heading could I ask the group to urgently address the following and give a written commitment that it will do so pending the setting up of an Independent Inquiry to examine the way it has gone about its work and to examine its findings.

A starting point would be the admission by the Government Whip, Tim Fortescue, on national television that MP’s and Governments keep allegations of paedophiliac behaviour by their own within house as trade offs – the Dirt Books practice.

The dictionary definition of “abhorrent” is disgusting, despicable, vile
You and the MPs now adopting the standard response bandy that word around as a soundbite but refuse to acknowledge or address how despicable, vile and disgusting it has been for fellow politicians not only to fail to report abuse by a colleague but to throw the net of protection around them so that they can carry on regardless.

This is a situation that applies to all parties and has nothing to do with political allegiances, party politics or as you seemed to imply in statements post-Savile exposures, a “gay witch-hunt”.

In my original letter I listed the issues surrounding Mrs. Thatcher’s relationship with Savile, his relationship with Prince Charles and many more which will need to be the subject of an Independent Inquiry as well as the scenario I first contacted Tom Watson MP, about in October 2012, ie the link between a powerful paedophile ring and No. 10 which very much remains a live and ever increasing Police investigation.

Will you now accept that it is time to honour your original promise of October 2012 that every institution MUST look at itself in the part it played in the protection of significant paedophiles or are you going to persist in the belief that ALL institutions exclude your own, and in effect tell us as the electorate that Parliament and politicians are above the law and you, as our political masters rather than as our public servants , will never be accountable for the “abhorrent” behaviour of a small but significant minority of your institutions.

An Independent Inquiry on a Hillsborough model is the only thing survivors will accept and then they can begin to trust that the worse scenarios, which have not yet come out, can be spoken about and they will be believed and that the wall of fear that they have hidden behind for decades will have been knocked down and no one is above justice and prosecution for the future.

Yours sincerely

Peter McKelvie

NOW 100

Supporters of an Inquiry
(The original group of seven MPs who initiated this are italicised). There are some small discrepancies between this list and that maintained by Exaro News, due to different criteria employed as to whether an MP has definitively declared their support or not. I try to point these out where necessary.

Conservatives: 22
Zac Goldsmith (Richmond Park)
Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham)
Bob Blackman (Harrow East)
Graham Brady (Altrincham and Sale West)
Robert Buckland (South Swindon)
Neil Carmichael (Stroud)
Douglas Carswell (Clacton)
Tracey Crouch (Chatham and Aylesforth)
Nick de Bois (Enfield North)
Nadine Dorries (Mid Bedfordshire)
Richard Drax (South Dorset)
George Freeman (Mid Norfolk)
Mark Garnier (Wyre Forest)
Charlotte Leslie (Bristol North West)
Jack Lopresti (Filton and Bradley Stoke)
Sir Peter Luff (Mid Worcestershire)
Jason McCartney (Colne Valley)
Paul Maynard (Blackpool North and Cleveleys)
Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton North)
Sir John Randall (Uxbridge and South Ruislip)
Henry Smith (Crawley)
Craig Whittaker (Calder Valley)

Exaro are also reporting Gordon Henderson as a supporter (saying he has indicated that to Tim Loughton), but I have been forwarded a generic reply from a constituent (reproduced below), dated 17/6/14; this constituent has since re-written to Henderson and I will update this blog if any further reply is received.

Liberal Democrats: 13
John Hemming (Birmingham Yardley)
Tessa Munt (Wells)
Annette Brooke (Mid Dorset and North Poole)
Paul Burstow (Sutton, Cheam & Worcester Park)
Stephen Gilbert (St Austell and Newquay)
Duncan Hames (Chippenham) (PPS to Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg)
Julian Huppert (Cambridge)
John Leech (Manchester Withington)
Greg Mulholland (Leeds North West)
Adrian Sanders (Torbay)
Ian Swales (Redcar)
Mike Thornton (Eastleigh)
Mark Williams (Ceredigion)

Labour: 56
Tom Watson (West Bromwich East)
Simon Danczuk (Rochdale)
Debbie Abrahams (Oldham East and Saddleworth)
Jon Ashworth (Leicester South)
Luciana Berger (Liverpool Wavertree)
Tom Blenkinsop (Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland)
Lyn Brown (West Ham)
Karen Buck (Westminster North, PPS to Ed Miliband)
Richard Burden (Birmingham Northfield)
Ronnie Campbell (Blyth Valley)
Martin Caton (Gower)
Katy Clark (North Ayrshire and Arran)
John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead)
Jim Cunningham (Coventry South)
Geraint Davies (Swansea West)
Jim Dobbin (Heywood and Middleton)
Michael Dugher (Barnsley East)
Natascha Engel (North-East Derbyshire)
Jim Fitzpatrick (Poplar and Limehouse)
Rob Flello (Stoke on Trent South)
Paul Flynn (Newport West)
Yvonne Fovargue (Makerfield)
Mary Glindon (North Tyneside)
Tom Greatrex (Rutherglen and Hamilton North)
Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish)
Huw Irranca-Davies (Ogmore)
Diane Johnson (Kingston-upon-Hull North)
Barbara Keeley (Worsley and Eccles South)
Emma Lewell-Buck (South Shields)
Kerry McCarthy (Bristol East)
Catherine McKinnell (Newcastle-Upon-Tyne North)
Khalid Mahmood (Birmingham Perry Barr)
John Mann (Bassetlaw)
Ian Mearns (Gateshead)
Grahame Morris (Easington)
Lisa Nandy (Wigan)
Sandra Osborne (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock)
Albert Owen (Ynys Mõn)
Teresa Pearce (Erith & Thamesmead)
Toby Perkins (Chesterfield)
Stephen Pound (Ealing North)
Yasmin Qureshi (Bolton South East)
Steve Reed (Croydon North)
Steve Rotherham (Liverpool Walton)
Lindsay Roy (Glenrothes)
Andy Sawford (Corbyn and East Northamptonshire)
Alison Seabeck (Plymouth Moor View)
Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield)
Jim Sheridan (Paisley and Renfrewshire North)
Gavin Shuker (Luton South)
Gisela Stuart (Birmingham Edgbaston)
Mark Tami (Alyn and Deeside)
Karl Turner (Kingston upon Hull East)
Derek Twigg (Halton)
Stephen Twigg (Liverpool West Derby)
Iain Wright (Hartlepool)

Exaro are not listing Lisa Nandy’s name on grounds that the Labour frontbench have to make a collective decision. I received confirmation by e-mail from Nandy on 17/6/14, and permission to quote the comment given below, and as there has been no response to two e-mails asking if her position has changed, I will keep this name on the list unless I hear from her office of a change of position.

Green: 1
Caroline Lucas (Brighton Pavilion)

Respect: 1
George Galloway (Bradford West)

Plaid Cymru: 3/em>
Jonathan Edwards (Camarthen West and Dinefwr)
Elfin Llwyd (Dwyfor Merionnydd)
Hywel Williams (Carmarthen West and Dinefwr)

Democratic Unionist Party: 5 (Northern Ireland)
Nigel Dodds (Belfast North)
Jeffrey Donaldson (Lagan Valley)
Dr William McCrea (Antrim South)
Ian Paisley Jr (North Antrim)
Jim Shannon (Strangford)

Social Democratic and Labour Party: 2 (Northern Ireland)
Mark Durkan (Foyle)
Margaret Ritchie (South Down)

Alliance: 1 (Northern Ireland)
Naomi Long (Belfast East)

Other supporters, not sitting MPs

Alan Hazelhurst (UKIP Parliamentary candidate for Wakefield)
Richard Howitt (MEP for Essex, Herts, Beds, Cambs, Norfolk, Suffolk).
Tony McNulty (former Labour MP for Harrow East)
Mike Parker (Plaid Cymru candidate for Ceredigion at 2015 election)
Peter Tatchell (former Green Party parliamentary candidate, Oxford East)

House of Lords

Baron Harris of Harringey

Organisations
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC)

5000 kids and babies missing from State care in the last two years where are they? Does anyone care?

As we edge ever and ever closer to discovering the true and horrifying scale of VIP child-abuse and murder in this country, the Mail reports on the shocking scandal of thousands of children ‘disappearing’ from council care.

According to figures released under the Freedom of Information Act, a staggering five thousand children have gone missing over the past two years, including babies, some of whom have yet to be found.

How the bloody hell can the Met police be given millions of taxpayers money to search for one child, Madeleine McCann, yet thousands of care children are discarded without so much as a missing person’s poster?

What is really happening to Britain’s missing care children?

The tragic truth is that most of them have been wrongly snatched in the first place, taken from loving parents by psycho-social workers, desperate to get a filthy bonus and meet their paedophilic master’s targets.

Parents are often poor and powerless and are unable to fight against secret courts, lying scumbag lawyers and the evil and twisted SS.

Their children are then thrown into a deliberately chaotic care-system, which is not monitored at all, and parents are not allowed any further contact with them so they conveniently ‘fall off’ the radar.

Unfortunately, this means they can often end up being groomed, raped, abused, and sadly sometimes murdered, by not only foster parents, care-home workers etc. but also by members of Britain’s VIP paedophile ring.

Labour filth, Margaret Hodge knows all about these rings and is the ultimate child-snatcher for her paedo pals, having instigated the vile Children’s Act, which gave the SS more and more powers to steal children from innocent parents.

She cackles like a demented slag when yet another family is split apart.

Some voices terrifyingly claim that mass graves exist in this country, filled with the little bodies of children who have been ritually abused then killed by these scumbags.

Why the hell don’t the Met get their diggers out on our soil first before s*****g themselves over the Portuguese hunt for Maddie?

Because they bloody daren’t that’s why.

But dear reader, know this.

Justice will soon descend on this septic isle of ours and God will expose their most heinous deeds to us all.

And when that happens, those who have perpetrated such evil crimes against the British public, may well regret the day they were f*****g born.

The clock is ticking now.

It’s only a matter of time…

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2651980/Britains-missing-babies-How-Thousands-children-disappeared-council-care-two-years-one-infant-found.html

Curtesy of the Coleman Experience 

How the sexual abuse of children is used for political gain

In 1995, the BBC showed a Michael Cockerell documentary called Westminster’s Secret Service about the role of the chief whip, whose task it is to ensure MPs attend important debates and vote as the party leadership desires. It was revealed that the chief whip kept a little black ‘dirt book’ which contained information about MPs, and this was used as a method of political control.

Tim Fortescue, who was Ted Heath’s chief whip from 1970-73, said:

For anyone with any sense, who was in trouble, would come to the whips and tell them the truth, and say now, I’m in a jam, can you help? It might be debt, it might be…..erm……erm, a scandal involving small boys, or any kind of scandal in which, erm er, a member seemed likely to be mixed up in, they’d come and ask if we could help and if we could, we did. And we would do everything we can because we would store up brownie points……., and if I mean, that sounds a pretty, pretty nasty reason, but it’s one of the reasons because if we could get a chap out of trouble then, he will do as we ask forever more.

In short, the chief whip would cover up any scandal, even if 

it involved “small boys”, child sexual abuse, child rape, 

whatever you want to call it. They wouldn’t report the crime 

to the police, although they may use their contacts with the 

police to make sure to make sure the matter went no further

. This means that a paedophile would be the ideal 

candidate for promotion within the party, easily blackmailed 

and bought, loyalty and discretion guaranteed.

An example of how the dirt book may have been used is 

the case of Sir Peter Morrison, who was Conservative MP 

for Chester from 1974-1992, as well as being Margaret 

Thatcher’s Parliamentary Private Secretary. Morrison has 

been linked to a notorious paedophile ring that sexually 

abused children in North Wales care homes. Chris House, 

who worked as reporter for the Daily Mirror, twice received 

tip-offs about Morrison being caught abusing underage 

boys which resulted in just a police caution, but libel threats 

stopped the newspaper from running the story. Peter 

Connew, the former editor of the Sunday Mirror, said “such 

was the hush-up that nobody could get hold of a log of the 

arrest”.

Edwina Currie, who was a Conservative MP at the time, 

said “Peter Morrison has become the PM’s PPS. Now he’s 

what they call ‘a noted pederast’,’ with a liking for young 

boys; he admitted as much to Norman Tebbitt when he 

became deputy chairman of the party, but added, ‘However,

 I’m very discreet’ – and he must be!”

It seems possible that Morrison was given the job of PPS 

precisely because he was a paedophile; the party had ‘dirt’ 

on him so they could rely on his loyalty. Morrison was an 

alcoholic, famously incompetent, and often found asleep at 

his desk, so I can’t think of any other reasons for his 

promotion to PPS. Not a thought was given to the poor 

children who he abused, and nobody in his party went to 

the police to stop him committing these crimes. Edwina 

Currie was quite happy to save this ‘gossip’ about child 

rape to boost her book sales.

If an MP’s ‘indiscretions’ became too public to cover up, 

they were demoted or exiled to an obscure position. Mike 

Hames, who was head of Scotland Yard’s Obscene 

Publications Branch, talked of a raid on a brothel during 

which a man in pinstriped suit announced that he a cabinet 

minister. “That was before the end of Communism and, 

through a politician friend, I informed the PM, Mrs Thatcher.

 I noticed that the man, a junior minister, was quietly 

dropped later in a reshuffle.”

Elm Guest House would have been well known to Margaret 

Thatcher, having been raided by 60 police and then covered

 up by the DPP and the Attorney General, who stopped the 

press from reporting on it. It is thought that at least 7 

Conservative MPs were visitors to the paedophile brothel. 

Were any of these MPs later promoted to ministerial 

positions?

Ted Heath is credited with introducing the dirt book:

The most significant changes in the role of the whips 

appear to have taken place during the late 1950s and early 

1960s. Heath as chief whip from 1956 to 1959 brought a 

new professionalism to the job; he was the first holder of 

that position to routinely attend cabinet meetings,although 

neither he nor his successors have been full cabinet 

members. More significant was the way he systematically 

gathered information about every member of the party, and 

developed the art of using this to maximum advantage. He 

was after all responsible for piloting the Conservative party 

through the Suez crisis and its turbulent aftermath. When 

Edward Short became Wilson’s chief whip in 1964 he found 

that it ‘had been the practice to keep a “dirt book” in which 

unsavoury personal items about members were recorded’, 

and he immediately ordered this to be discontinued. It is 

probable that such stories arose simply out of the 

thoroughness with which Heath and his successors had 

gathered information. Heath himself explained his 

rofessionalism: ‘I acted on the principle that the more you 

know about the people you ae speaking for, and the more 

they know about you and what you are being asked to do, 

the better.’ (extract from ‘Churchill to Major: The British 

Prime Ministership Since 1945′ by

Donald Shell)

So the chief whip would proactively look for ‘dirt’ on MPs, 

not just wait for them to get into trouble. This might explain 

how the child abuse campaigner Geoffrey Dickens MP was 

so quickly exposed for having an extra-marital affair after 

he named the paedophile diplomat Sir Peter Hayman.

Although the Labour chief whip, Edward Short, claims to 

have discontinued the dirt book system, it seems obvious 

that both Labour and the Liberals would have continued to 

use it. The Liberal MP Cyril Smith would have needed his 

own book given his record of child sex offences stretching 

from the 1960s to the late 1990s, which makes it all the 

more staggering that former Liberal leader David Steel 

claims never to have received a complaint about him. 

Smith, as an Elm Guest House visitor, a friend of Jimmy 

Savile, and an associate of both Peter Righton and Sidney 

Cooke, would have been impossible for the chief whip to 

control, as he would have been able to bring most of 

Westminster down with him.

Fleet Street also have their own version of the dirt book, 

used to exercise control over politicians. What other 

explanation could there be for the Sunday Times/News 

International not using the leaked Operation Ore list, 

despite there being enough VIP paedophiles on the list “to 

fill newspaper front pages for an entire year”?

http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/the-dirt-

book-how-the-sexual-abuse-of-children-is-used-for-political-

gain/