Mick Creedon Derbyshire Police Chief in charge operation Herne turns out to run police officers involved in murder, violence, letter bombs, false arrests, set-ups and smear campaigns

  Hot of the press of the Daily Agenda 

Police Constable Mick Creedon who has been put in charge of Operation Herne   and set-up  Child abuse whistle blower  Andrea Davison  is discovered to be running  Police Officers involved in Murder and violence and cover-ups.

 When is a whistleblower not a whistleblower? 

The case of former undercover SDS officer Peter Francis provides us with the perfect example because he has not confessed to everything he knows about covert operations.

Francis personifies the State story-teller who is only prepared to go so far with his revelations, either for reasons of self-preservation or just sheer dishonesty.

What motivates Francis to withhold so much vital information about SDS operations, particularly it’s involvement in and organising street violence?

 

Francis claims SDS officers did not participate in street violence and would have been withdrawn from duty if they had but the truth contradicts his version of events at every stage.
Three examples are the undercover SDS officers inside Class War, Combat 18 and the British National Party in the early 1990s.

In the case of Class War, the SDS officer admitted to former MI5 officer David Shayler that he had participated in and organised violence against the police and right-wing political activists.

From experience, I can confirm that Class War activists were never prepared to mix it with nationalists unless they carried a variety of weapons ranging from axes, hammers, baseball bats and knives. This means the SDS officer most definitely took part in and organised violence to maintain his cover.

In truth, this example proves SDS officers committed criminal offences ranging from carrying concealed weapons, offences against the person and a string of serious public order offences.
Shayler, described by Francis as a “desk wanker” had the undercover SDS officer pulled because apparently he had gone native.

And the lack of natural curiosity on the part of Derbyshire Police regarding Class War whistleblower Marco Radulovic and his claims relating to the murder of Ian Stuart Donaldson, proves Operation Herne is not dedicated to uncovering the truth about covert police operations.

Corrupt Chief Constable Mick Creedon tasked with spinning another public relations fairy tale

Chief Constable Mick Creedon tasked with spinning another public relations fairy tale

The second case relates to the undercover SDS officer inside Combat 18 and this one is far more serious than the Class War example.

To maintain his cover inside C18, the SDS officer would have been expected to take part in and organise serious violence against far Left opponents, primarily on the streets of London before C18 was flipped and launched its all-out war against the BNP.

Activists who were on the frontline can confirm with ease that Peter Francis simply is not telling the whole truth about the SDS and is feeding The Guardian with sanitised public relations material.

Having been flipped by MI5 in 1993, Combat 18 launched all-out war on senior BNP leaders and began a campaign that led to letter bombs being sent to the BNP HQ in Kent and senior BNP leaders being attacked in their own homes.

Before being turned against the BNP, I fought alongside Combat 18 in a street battle with Red Action in the East End of London and the Mancunians got hammered so badly the Met Police riot squad had to save them.

Throw undercover agent alias ‘Stephen Bagan’ into the equation, seconded to target Combat 18 for MI5, and we have a picture of State-sponsored violence against genuine political activists.

The State-sponsored clown Dave Hann can be ignored in this context. The self-proclaimed hero of Red Action claims they sent letter bombs to the BNP HQ but this merely begs the question why he has not been arrested for the offence?

Even State-sponsored Searchlight Magazine does not take Hann seriously and his book ‘No Retreat’ should be dismissed as a typical work of fiction produced by Milo Books and its infotainment machine.

The third example of SDS duplicity comes in the form of the SDS officer I encountered and tried to expose at the BNP HQ in November 1993. It should be noted that this particular specimen had an uncanny knack of avoiding the letter bombs posted to the BNP HQ but no one else did. One such device seriously injured Alf Waite and other dummy devices failed to detonate.

On all occasions, the SDS officer who worked inside the BNP HQ avoided the letter bombs both real and dummy devices. Does this indicate foreknowledge of the devices being sent to the building?

The SDS and MI5 both had undercover operatives inside Combat 18 and at the time in the BNP there was no doubt at all that C18 was behind the violence against the BNP not Dave ‘peter pan’ Hann and Red Action.

Therefore, the sanitised tales of SDS officers targeting women with whom they sired offspring, appalling though it is, represents only half the story and the real meat has been left out of The Guardian’s story-telling.

Of course, the public cannot be allowed to think that the police ‘service’ they fund took part in and routinely organised violence against political activists.

I do not accuse Francis of being a complete liar and what he has disclosed so far is mostly true but his claim SDS officers did not take take part in and organise violence inside left-wing and right-wing groups is pure fiction.

And have the police changed in the slightest since these revelations? Let’s turn to Derbyshire Police tasked with Operation Herne and my attempted murder in 1990 in Derbyshire.

For 23 years, Derbyshire Police lied about the existence of the Special Branch officer who tried to recruit me on 24 January 1990 and organised a vicious smear campaign against me.

But on 26 July 2013, DCI Jim Allen, Staff Officer to the Chief Constable, admitted in writing the existence of DC 1111 Frank Bailey and did not deny the ‘failed attempted recruitment’.
In an instant, the 23-year smear campaign came crashing down in flames but the arrogance of the police is personified by the antics of DCI Allen.

Having made requests to obtain all of the data, which Derbyshire Police claimed did not exist in 2005, DCI Allen wanted to meet me, empty-handed of course, before he had obtained the data.
He suggested the remote village of Little Eaton in Derbyshire, off the CCTV network and claimed this was a “neutral location”. But if the police suggest a location it is not “neutral” it is in fact an arrest ambush…

I responded by inviting DCI Allen to meet me in Pimlico or Belgravia in London but he declined the offer, which made a mockery of his assurance that he would meet me at any location of my choosing.
Of course, police officers lie with the ease with which the rest of us draw breath and DCI Allen’s infantile games are of no real surprise.

The simple truth is that the police have not changed in the slightest and they are still the same deceitful, arrogant, lying, organised criminal gang.

And the public inquiry into Special Branch authorised by the Home Office will be nothing of the sort. It will be another Leveson pantomime but this time held behind closed doors.

I refuse to cooperate with this quasi-inquiry in any respect and will never give it the ‘credibility’ it craves because it will centre of the smear campaign against the Lawrence family and the women targeted by the SDS.

But the real truth, the explosive dirt on the SDS will not be heard at any such ‘inquiry’ and it is therefore stillborn and typically useless.

I have now begun the process of instructing  a firm of solicitors to sue Derbyshire Police for its despicable 23-year smear campaign, which was designed to destroy me but it failed in spectacular fashion.

Trust the police? That must rank as the funniest fairy tale I’ve read since Derbyshire Police solicitor Alison ‘in wonderland’ Clarke issued a string of denials about Special Branch.

I will close this article with the words of Stephen Bagan who confirmed in August 2012 that the Combat 18 ‘plot’ to murder Bernie Grant MP “turned out to be bullshit”.

Bagan also told me, “you’re a lot harder and braver than you’ll ever know” and that was what really worried me because precisely what else did Bagan know?

Read more  google-law.blogspot.com/2013/07/jillings-report-into-abuse-in-north.html

http://google-law.blogspot.com.ar/2013/06/nottingham-police-sexually-assault.html

Read origional article from the daily agenda  http://thedailyagenda.wordpress.com/2013/08/23/former-sds-officer-peter-francis-is-the-personification-of-what-we-should-not-regard-as-a-whistleblower/

Snowden says UK Government leaked Listening Post 'secrets' to Newspaper

Whistle  blower Edward Snowden accuses the British Government of lies and deception. Well  nothing new there!


In a statement to the Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, Mr Snowden has blamed the Government for the leak:

I have never spoken with, worked with, or provided any journalistic materials to the Independent.
The journalists I have worked with have, at my request, been judicious and careful in ensuring that the only things disclosed are what the public should know but that does not place any person in danger.
It appears that the UK government is now seeking to create an appearance that the Guardian and Washington Post's disclosures are harmful, and they are doing so by intentionally leaking harmful information to The Independent and attributing it to others.

So the UK Government leaked information about the GCHQ listening post in the Arabian Ocean to the Independent.  The location of the listening post  has been made mysterious but we understand they are not so secret.

Listening post saga all very  Lawrence of Arabia

LISTENING POSTS NOT SO SECRET AFTER ALL 

US, UK   Chinese and Indian intelligence services are setting-up listening posts on the Arabian Sea within monitoring distance of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen.  These countries all  have their eyes on  Oman, the Maldives and Madagascar.  Industrial espionage  (spying on other governments for their commercial, political and military secrets)  is now rife and competative,

The  US National Security Agency (NSA) has had most comprehensive network of listening posts in the Arabian Sea, facilities that were used extensively during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, In addition to stations in Abut and on the island of Masirh, in Oman, the NSA has two interception posts in the Musandam peninsula a parcel of land belongining to Oman north of Ras al-khamah, in the UAE, just opposite Iran.

There are also NSA listening facilities at Bharains Al-Muharrag Airport and in the UAE island of Sir Abu Nuayr, 80 KM of the coast of Abu Dhabi. Further to these facilities the NSA has a listening post in Diego Garcia off Mauritius, and recently built a second on Masirah, a clandestine listening hub that during the Cold War was home to a British Government Communications HQ (GCHQ) facility,

Chinas floating facilities in the Arabian  Sea are supported by Chinese specialists  who now also  support Pakistan’s and Iran’s intelligence services

To boost its presence in the regions the 3^rd Department of the Chinese Peoples Liberation Army which is in charge of interception, is working to develop its ties with countries such as Djibouti and Kenya.

China regularly dispatches oceanographic observation vessels, crammed with sophisticated interception material, to the Arabian Sea. These frequently find themselves crossing paths with Dupuy de Lome the French Navy sea intelligence ship which spends much of its time in the same waters.

The Independent reported that the facility allegedly collects emails, phone calls and web traffic on behalf of western intelligence agencies, which is why the government asked the Guardian to destroy files relating to Snowden.  This is just a form of industrial espionage on smaller nations.

 

All smoke and mirrors to persecute a few small people who Western Governments fear because they have morals and are brave.  Meanwhile South American Nations welcome people with morals, integrety and genious.   As Western Governments  sink deeper and deeper into the mud of their  own corruption. South America like a lotus is blooming from out of the mud.

Britian issued a D notice on June  the 7th  to stop the publicaton of

‘specific covert operations, sources and methods of the security services, SIS and GCHQ, Defence Intelligence Units, Special Forces and those involved with them, the application of those methods, including the interception of communications and their targets; the same applies to those engaged on counter-terrorist operations’.

But we all know that this only applies to  operations which could interfere with  the governments on-going criminal enterprises.  Come on no-one with more than two brain cells believes the propaganda any more about protecting intelligence sources  or preventing terrorism.  We know the Government ran the  provisional IRA.  Come on we are not idiots,

Britain's Arabian Sea spy base to snoop on foreign Governments political and commercial secrets revealed by Snowden

Britain has a £1 billion secret Middle East-based listening post collecting emails, phone calls and web traffic on behalf of western intelligence agencies, the NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden has revealed. The location of the  billion dollor secret  post has not been disclosed,  but our sources believe  it is in  the Arabian Ocean.   Oman would  fits in with Project X in Africa and the US listening posts in Turkey and the middle East.

The Independent revealed it had learned of the internet-monitoring station facility from the leaks made by the US Whistle Blower


The secret internet-monitoring project is still a work in progress and is being organised by the UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), according to Edward Snowden’s leaked documents. 

UPDATE  read more details on the location  and use of  listening posts http://google-law.blogspot.com/2013/08/snowden-says-uk-government-leaked.html





Edward Snowden has revealed Britain has a secret middle-east surveillance base In a sensational twist, the newspaper claimed fears the site could be discovered was one of the reasons the Government asked the Guardian to destroy hard drives containing a copy of the Snowden files.

Earlier  Snowden had revealed  that Britian Spyed on foreign politicians at 2009 G-20 London Summit

As revealed by Edward Snowden in The Guardian, GCHQ spied on foreign politicians visiting the 2009 G-20 London Summit by eavesdropping phonecalls, emails and monitoring their computers, and in some cases even ongoing after the summit via keyloggers that had been installed during the summit.^[33] Some of the information gained has been passed on to British politicians.

Now the British and their American masters are spying on Foreign Governments and Foreign Nationals to gain themselves advantages in commercial enterprises.  The excuse that they are monitoring terrorists is laughable when the UK and the USA run  the big terrorist organisations  and small groups of real  terrorists are quickly eliminated.

The operation is part of a wider GCHQ surveillance and monitoring system, code-named Tempora, a £1 billion scheme to monitor communications around the world.
Information collected at the installation is sent to GCHQ's headquarters in Cheltenham and shared with the National Security Agency in the US.
Content is held in storage "buffers" before being sifted for material of particular interest.
The listening post was established under the last government under a warrant signed by former foreign secretary David Miliband.
The warrant authorised GCHQ to collect information about the "political intentions of foreign powers", terrorism, proliferation, mercenaries and private military companies, and serious financial fraud.
The issue is revisited every six months and can be changed by ministers at will. GCHQ officials are free to target anyone who is overseas or communicating from overseas without further checks or controls if they think they fall within the terms of a current certificate.
The Independent said the information about the project was contained in 50,000 GCHQ documents Mr Snowden downloaded during 2012.
Much of the material reportedly came from an internal Wikipedia-style site called GC-Wiki. Unlike the public Wikipedia, GCHQ's wiki was generally classified Top Secret or above.
The Foreign Office refused to confirm or deny the accuracy of the reports when contacted by the Press Association, saying only that it did not comment on intelligence matters.
The revelation follows the Metropolitan Police’s launch of a terrorism investigation into information found on the computer of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald’s partner, David Miranda.
The data, along with all of Miranda’s electronic devices, was seized during a nine-hour detention in Heathrow airport on Sunday. British authorities held Miranda under Schedule 7 of the UK’s Terrorism Act.

American mother wrongly jailed in Holloway to be deported but the UK will keep her poor baby for forced adoption

US MOTHER to be deported whilst her child is kept for adoption

August 23, 2013 story published by victims unite

The US mother of a single child is one of some 50 foreign nationals kept in Holloway, whilst their children are in ‘care’.

 
Her judgement to ‘discharge’ the stay on her deportation is on John Hemming MP’s blog.

This is an extract from John Hemming MP's blog 

 Mother to be deported whilst her child is kept for adoption
This JR judgment (which I have anonymised) is about an American woman:






 She was living here and her child was taken into care. Now she is to be deported and her child kept for adoption. An application was made for judicial review which has failed (this documents the failure).
I am surprised that the US government are comfortable about this (if they know).
It also raises a question for her child in the future. When (as is often the case with adopted people) the child asks what happened to her mother he or she will be told that:
a) We took you off her
b) We locked her up preventing her from properly appealing the decisions
c) Then we deported her ... and
d) No you are not allowed to know the reasons for this.
Incidentally at the moment the people trying to help this mother are trying to get other applications made on her behalf, but she needs to sign them. She is in prison (for immigration reasons) and is not being allowed to sign them.

 
There were Two ‘reconsiderations’ of the order to deport  and another refusal are before the Court that says a hearing will take place within 8 weeks.

The barrister who submitted the Judicial Review that caused the published judgement wrote that UKBA knows every second that she is being held is illegal. For 14 months are beyond EU rules  and in UK rules it is  ‘excessive’ rather than ‘reasonable’

What can she do? Submit another application. From prison conditions that are made to prevent her from access to justice: no money for phone calls and mail delayed, besides McKenzie Friends not being allowed to take papers in and out. Only solicitors. Two law firms advised her badly. One suggested she should change her non-guilty plea to ‘guilty’ when she is innocent.

Victims Unite commented that:-

"We only know what we’re up against when we’re in it and directly hit and concerned"

So Brazil  can make a strong protest when one of their citizen David Mirander is illegally held for 9 hours by the British Police but the USA make no protest when their citizen is wrongly held for months in an evil womens prison whilst  the British government steal her little child. You can bet the child is pretty,  Come on USA make a protest!

What Bradley Manning exposed and why they hate him so much

What Manning Revealed

The debate in the media, and in political, circles over Edward Snowden--Right or Wrong--often doubles back on references to Bradley Manning, who was sentenced to 35 years in prison this morning.  Too often (that is, most of the time), the value and import of the Manning/WikiLeaks disclosures are ignored or dismissed, just as Snowden's NSA scoops often derided as "nothing new." 

So for those who either suffer from memory loss or ignorance on this particular score, here is a partial accounting of some of the important revelations in the Manning leak, drawn from my book and e-book (with Kevin Gosztola) on the Manning case, Truth and Consequences.  The book was updated to this past June for the start of the trial but the revelations below all came before March 2011--many others followed, including the Gitmo files.

First, just a very partial list from "Cablegate" (excluding many other bombshells that caused a stir in smaller nations abroad):

-Yemeni president lied to his own people, claiming his military carried out air strikes on militants actually done by U.S.  All part of giving U.S. full rein in country against terrorists.

-Details on Vatican hiding big sex abuse cases in Ireland.

-U.S. tried to get Spain to curb its probes of Gitmo torture and rendition.

-Egyptian torturers trained by FBI—although allegedly to teach the human rights issues.

-State Dept memo: U.S.-backed 2009 coup in Honduras was 'illegal and unconstitutional.'”

-Cables on Tunisia appear to help spark revolt in that country. The country's ruling elite described as “The Family,” with Mafia-like skimming throughout the economy. The country's First Lady may have made massive profits off a private school.

-U.S. knew all about massive corruption in Tunisia back in 2006 but went on supporting the government anyway, making it the pillar of its North Africa policy.

-Cables showed the UK promised in 2009 to protect U.S interests in the official Chilcot inquiry on the start of the Iraq war.

-U.S. pressured the European Union to accept GM — genetic modification, that is. 

-Washington was misled by our own diplomats on Russia-Georgia showdown.

-Extremely important historical document finally released in full: Ambassador April Glaspie's cable from Iraq in 1990 on meeting with Saddam Hussein before Kuwait invasion.

-The UK sidestepped a ban on housing cluster bombs. Officials concealed from Parliament how the U.S. is allowed to bring weapons on to British soil in defiance of treaty.

-New York Times:  “From hundreds of diplomatic cables, Afghanistan emerges as a looking-glass land where bribery, extortion and embezzlement are the norm and the honest man is a distinct outlier.”

-Afghan vice president left country with $52 million “in cash.”

-Shocking levels of U.S. spying at the United Nations (beyond what was commonly assumed) and intense use of diplomats abroad in intelligence-gathering roles.

-Potential environmental disaster kept secret by the U.S. when a large consignment of highly enriched uranium in Libya came close to cracking open and leaking radioactive material into the atmosphere.

-U.S. used threats, spying, and more to try to get its way at last year's crucial climate conference in Copenhagen.

-Hundreds of cables detail U.S. use of diplomats as “sales” agents, more than previously thought, centering on jet rivalry of Boeing vs. Airbus. Hints of corruption and bribes.

-Millions in U.S. military aid for fighting Pakistani insurgents went to other gov't uses (or stolen) instead.

-Israel wanted to bring Gaza to the ”brink of collapse.”

-The U.S. secret services used Turkey as a base to transport terrorism suspects as part of its extraordinary rendition program.

-As protests spread in Egypt, cables revealed that strong man Suleiman was at center of government's torture programs, causing severe backlash for Mubarak after he named Suleiman vice president during the revolt.  Other cables revealed or confirmed widespread Mubarak regime corruption, police abuses and torture, and claims of massive Mubarak famiiy fortune, significantly influencing media coverage and U.S. response.

Now, an excerpt from our book on just small aspect of the Iraq war cables.  This doesn't even include the release of the "Collateral Murder" video earlier.

Al Jazeera suggested that the real bombshell was the U.S. allowing Iraqis to torture detainees. Documents revealed that U.S. soldiers sent 1300 reports to headquarters with graphic accounts, including a few about detainees beaten to death.  Some U.S. generals wanted our troops to intervene, but Pentagon chiefs disagreed, saying these assaults should only be reported, not stopped.   At a time the U.S. was declaring that no torture was going on, there were 41 reports of such abuse still happening “and yet the U.S. chose to turn its back.”
      The New York Times report on the torture angle included this: “The six years of reports include references to the deaths of at least six prisoners in Iraqi custody, most of them in recent years. Beatings, burnings and lashings surfaced in hundreds of reports, giving the impression that such treatment was not an exception. In one case, Americans suspected Iraqi Army officers of cutting off a detainee’s fingers and burning him with acid. Two other cases produced accounts of the executions of bound detainees.
    “And while some abuse cases were investigated by the Americans, most noted in the archive seemed to have been ignored, with the equivalent of an institutional shrug: soldiers told their officers and asked the Iraqis to investigate….That policy was made official in a report dated May 16, 2005, saying that ‘if US forces were not involved in the detainee abuse, no further investigation will be conducted until directed by HHQ.’ In many cases, the order appeared to allow American soldiers to turn a blind eye to abuse of Iraqis on Iraqis.” 
     Amnesty International quickly called on the U.S. to investigate how much our commanders knew about Iraqi torture.
     A top story at the Guardian, meanwhile, opened: “Leaked Pentagon files obtained by the Guardian contain details of more than 100,000 people killed in Iraq following the US-led invasion, including more than 15,000 deaths that were previously unrecorded.
     “British ministers have repeatedly refused to concede the existence of any official statistics on Iraqi deaths. U.S. General Tommy Franks claimed 'We don't do body counts.' The mass of leaked documents provides the first detailed tally by the U.S. military of Iraqi fatalities. Troops on the ground filed secret field reports over six years of the occupation, purporting to tote up every casualty, military and civilian.
     “Iraq Body Count, a London-based group that monitors civilian casualties, told the Guardian:  'These logs contain a huge amount of entirely new information regarding casualties. Our analysis so far indicates that they will add 15,000 or more previously unrecorded deaths to the current IBC total. This data should never have been withheld from the public”’  The logs recorded a total of 109,032 violent deaths between 2004 and 2009.
     Citing a new document,  the Times reported: “According to one particularly painful entry from 2006, an Iraqi wearing a tracksuit was killed by an American sniper who later discovered that the victim was the platoon’s interpreter….The documents...reveal many previously unreported instances in which American soldiers killed civilians—at checkpoints, from helicopters, in operations. Such killings are a central reason Iraqis turned against the American presence in their country, a situation that is now being repeated in Afghanistan.”

And now,  re: the Afghanistan war logs:

     The Times highlighted it as “The War Logs” with the subhed, “A six-year archive of classified military documents offers an unvarnished and grim picture of the Afghan war.” Explicitly, or by extension, the release also raised questions about the media coverage of the war to date.
     The Guardian carried a tough editorial on its web site, calling the picture “disturbing” and raising doubts about ever winning this war, adding: “These war logs—written in the heat of engagement—show a conflict that is brutally messy, confused and immediate.  It is in some contrast with the tidied-up and sanitized 'public' war, as glimpsed through official communiques as well as the necessarily limited snapshots of embedded reporting.”
     Elsewhere, the paper traced the CIA and paramilitary roles in the deaths of civilians in Afghanistan, many cases hidden until now. In one incident, a U.S. patrol machine-gunned a bus, wounding or killing 15.  David Leigh wrote, “They range from the shootings of individual innocents to the often massive loss of life from air strikes, which eventually led President Hamid Karzai to protest publicly that the US was treating Afghan lives as ‘cheap’.”
     The paper said the logs also detailed “how the Taliban have caused growing carnage with a massive escalation of their roadside bombing campaign, which has killed more than 2,000 civilians to date.”    Previously unknown friendly fire incidents also surfaced.
     The White House, which knew what was coming, quickly slammed the release of classified reports -– most labeled “secret” — and pointed out the documents ended in 2009, just before the president set a new policy in the war; and claimed that the whole episode was suspect because WikiLeaks was against the war.   Still, it was hard to dismiss official internal memos such as:  “The general view of Afghans is that current gov't is worse than the Taliban.”
     Among the revelations that gained prime real estate from The New York Times: “The documents… suggest that Pakistan, an ostensible ally of the United States, allows representatives of its spy service to meet directly with the Taliban in secret strategy sessions to organize networks of militant groups that fight against American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even hatch plots to assassinate Afghan leaders.”  The Guardian, however, found no “smoking gun” on this matter. The Times also reported that the U.S. had given Afghans credit for missions carried out by our own Special Ops teams. 

source and thanks to  http://gregmitchellwriter.blogspot.com.ar/2013/06/as-debate-continues-what-manning.html