tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4218939393808883918.post88187836502170933..comments2024-01-30T02:09:55.073-08:00Comments on JUSTICE DENIED: Attorney General Michael Havers brother to Butler-Sloss was a VIP paedophile Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4218939393808883918.post-15693472339100226012014-08-12T23:51:25.290-07:002014-08-12T23:51:25.290-07:00Now that Sir Keith Joseph's name is published ...Now that Sir Keith Joseph's name is published it must, surely, be time to re-examine his decisions when DHSS Minister. To refuse Commons calls in 1972 for full inquiry into:<br /><br />(1) The Sue Ryder HQ Cavendish Suffolk. Two deaths by drowning (lake and bath) in six months and the context of appalling care standards<br /><br />(2) The unknown number of child deaths, of disabled children in Hackney Social Services care, at The Beeches, Ixworth, Suffolk.<br /><br />We now know that the 1972 Commons questions happened to coincide with the inmates revolt, which created the disabled persons human rights movement, at LeCourt Leonard Cheshire Home. There had been some years of group psychiatric research conducted by Tavistock Institute on all the care home resident communities in UK of Leonard Cheshire Homes. This research had been commissioned by Dept of Health. But details of its legality and purpose are still refused disclosure by Attorney General (Dominic Grieve).<br /><br />We also now know that in Wales the Regional Crime Squad escalated inquiry in 1972 from aliens registrations (Foreign care workers) into suspicions of GP Death registration fraud used for identity theft to acquire UK identities. This was inquiry into the husband and wife charities of Leonard Cheshire and Sue Ryder.<br /><br />IIRC the civil servant who issued Sir Keith Joseph's refusal of inquiry, re deaths and care at the Cavendish HQ care home of Cheshire and Ryder, was Celia Hensman. Now an MBE following work with C of E Childrens Society. Perhaps she has recall ?<br /><br />What we now know is that the refusal of inquiry from Sir Keith also coincided with the New Zealand Govt having requested that the inquest into their citizen, volunteer Matron Mary McGill, at the Sue Ryder HQ Jan 1972, be re-opened. Hence at the time DHSS under Sir Keith was refusing care inquiry, the Home Office in cahoots with Suffolk Chief constable Arthur Burns was lying to the New Zealand Govt to fob off their approach for justice.<br /><br />In the 1990s Christs College Cambridge spokesperson proffered information, attributed to a C of E Bishop alumnus, that it would be worth looking for Common Lines of Inquiry between the Sue Ryder volunteers and staff and the staff at the Beeches or at Hackney Social Services. Suggesting that people who had involved with the Katherine Low Settlement charity could be common to both sudden death and poor care settings in Suffolk (Sue Ryder and Beeches)<br /><br />The only Bishop alumnus I can find is Rowan Williams. Was it he who wanted to source information from anonymity via his old college ? <br /><br />What is certainly true is that if inquiry into abuse had been mounted in the 1970s it would have tripped over Savile abuse at the Sue Ryder child hospice in Leeds.<br /><br />These two case histories were put to Dame Janet Smith's Stage 3 Harold Shipman Inquiry. The problems that arose in the associated death registration practices and Coroners involvements. Dame Janet ruled that both cases were beyond her terms of reference to examine weaknesses in our death registration methods.<br /><br />So to my mind Dame Janet conducting BBC Savile Inquiry is to say the least open to question.<br /><br />As far as I know to this day no one knows how many children died at the Beeches 1966 to 1972. No one knows why the local HM Coroner has no realistic overview on record. If deaths occurred at Ixworth or at the Bury St Edmunds Hospital they would have been in his jurisdiction and an overview of a pattern of deaths in care in his area have emerged. Where were deaths declared ? Why in 6 years did only two deaths of children get inquests ? Which HM Coroners waived inquests and let GP certification go through ? <br /><br />For 42 years the presence of ileac crest bruising on Matron McGill's body, has been ignored. This is an indicator of anal rape or attempted anal rape. We now know that Leonard Cheshire did not tell the truth to Inquest. Which left the final 19 hours of Matron's life unaccounted. But in 1972 in the New Zealand press there was later an admission by Cheshire that he had spoken with Matron McGill during that final 19 hours. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com